2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep15283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative application of Tau protein in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease diagnosis: Improvement for weakly positive 14-3-3 protein in the laboratory

Abstract: The 14-3-3 protein has been used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD). However, weakly positive 14-3-3 leads to false positive results and an incorrect diagnosis. We attempted to use quantitative data for tau protein to provide an accurate diagnosis based on weak 14-3-3 protein. Sixty-two patients with sCJD, including pathologically confirmed, clinically definite, and probable cases, and 89 non-CJD patients were investigated based on a Korean population. Among them, 20 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the combined use of 14-3-3, tau, and the p-tau/tau ratio improved the specificity of diagnosis for undefined 14-3-3 measurements (weak positive/traces) [24], our data suggest that tau and/or p-tau/tau measurements are sufficient to correctly differentiate between sCJD and non-CJD cases with almost full accuracy. Taking into account that both biomarkers are usually routinely analyzed in clinical dementia centers, the present data support the use of the p-tau/tau ratio in the sCJD clinical diagnostic routine as the first discriminatory assay with high sensitivity, which could be further validated with the RT-QuIC test [17], a new highly specific diagnostic platform not yet fully implemented in all diagnostic centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the combined use of 14-3-3, tau, and the p-tau/tau ratio improved the specificity of diagnosis for undefined 14-3-3 measurements (weak positive/traces) [24], our data suggest that tau and/or p-tau/tau measurements are sufficient to correctly differentiate between sCJD and non-CJD cases with almost full accuracy. Taking into account that both biomarkers are usually routinely analyzed in clinical dementia centers, the present data support the use of the p-tau/tau ratio in the sCJD clinical diagnostic routine as the first discriminatory assay with high sensitivity, which could be further validated with the RT-QuIC test [17], a new highly specific diagnostic platform not yet fully implemented in all diagnostic centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of Ab 1-42 , p-tau protein and BACE-1 in mice brain tissue was detected using the ELISA kit performed according to the operating instructions. [32,33] Experimental protocol for primary cortical neuron culture…”
Section: Experimental Protocol For Behaviour Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Llorens et al [50], p-Tau/t-Tau ratio discriminating power was higher in the differential diagnosis of sCJD when compared with other dementias than Tau alone. In our study, the combination of t-Tau with p-Tau in the p-Tau/t-Tau ratio did not improve diagnostic accuracy in relation to t-Tau alone, but resulted in a similar improvement in specificity and overall accuracy in relation to Tau ratio improved the specificity of diagnosis compared with the use of the 14-3-3 protein assay alone (47 % for 14-3-3 alone; 86 % for 14-3-3 combined with t-Tau; and 91 % for 14-3-3 combined with the p-Tau/t-Tau ratio) [31]. However, in the same study, very few patients had autopsyproven diagnosis, in contrast with our study, in which all sCJD patients had neuropathological confirmation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the ratio between p-Tau and t-Tau levels (p-Tau/t-Tau) has shown to improve discrimination between AD or other RPDs and sCJD, with lower levels in favour of the latter [14,24,29,30]. Only limited information is available on p-Tau/t-Tau ratio optimal cutoff levels and its comparative value in relation to 14-3-3 or t-Tau alone [31]. Along with the introduction of these alternative CSF markers in laboratories worldwide, questions about the sensitivity, specificity, and added value of these assays, although recognised as extremely useful, have been raising.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%