1984
DOI: 10.1086/161866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternating-side ejection in extragalactic radio sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, its mere existence shows that the M 87 jet is two-sided as it is launched, which is commonly assumed, but rarely proven in superluminal sources. This provides evidence against flip-flop models (e.g., Rudnick & Edgar 1984) where the jet is one-sided at any given time. Secondly, the ratio of brightness of the jet and counter-jet, if it is assumed to be the result of Doppler boosting, gives a measure of the jet speed.…”
Section: The Counter-jetmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Firstly, its mere existence shows that the M 87 jet is two-sided as it is launched, which is commonly assumed, but rarely proven in superluminal sources. This provides evidence against flip-flop models (e.g., Rudnick & Edgar 1984) where the jet is one-sided at any given time. Secondly, the ratio of brightness of the jet and counter-jet, if it is assumed to be the result of Doppler boosting, gives a measure of the jet speed.…”
Section: The Counter-jetmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In either case, the dominance of intrinsic asymmetry (Q int = 1) excludes the possibility of applying the elegant formulation of Banhatti (1980) to determine the velocity distribution analytically from the observed Q-distribution. It may also be mentioned that several researchers (e.g., Ryś 1994; LHG) have attempted to model the Q-distribution within the framework of the alternate ejection hypothesis proposed by Rudnick & Edgar (1984) (see also, Willis, Wilson & Strom 1978;Wiita & Siah 1981;Komberg 1994), though differing conclusions have been reached ( §7.2). The first treatment of the lobe expansion which treated the dynamics of a relativistic hot-spot was given by Gopal-Krishna, Wiita & Saripalli (1989).…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the possibilities that (i) the jets are intrinsically symmetric but appear one-sided or highly asymmetric because the brightness of the receding one is diminished due to bulk relativistic motion while the approaching jet is boosted for the same reason (Rees 1978;Blandford & Königl 1979;Scheuer & Readhead 1979); (ii) the active beam on the counter-jet side has a low synchrotron emissivity and (iii) the energy supply is intrinsically asymmetric, but supplies energy alternately on opposite sides of the nucleus (cf. Saikia & Wiita 1982;Rudnick & Edgar 1984). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%