ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2019.8682811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternating Phase Projected Gradient Descent with Generative Priors for Solving Compressive Phase Retrieval

Abstract: The classical problem of phase retrieval arises in various signal acquisition systems. Due to the ill-posed nature of the problem, the solution requires assumptions on the structure of the signal. In the last several years, sparsity and support-based priors have been leveraged successfully to solve this problem. In this work, we propose replacing the sparsity/support priors with generative priors and propose two algorithms to solve the phase retrieval problem. Our proposed algorithms combine the ideas from Alt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first consider synthetic experiments on a two-layer network given by G(z) = N (0, 1). And the dimension of latent vector k is chosen from [10,15,20,25,30]. We set the total number of iterations to T = 300, and the number of phaseless measurement m ranges from 20 to 1000 with interval 50.…”
Section: Results Of Random Target On Fully-connected Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We first consider synthetic experiments on a two-layer network given by G(z) = N (0, 1). And the dimension of latent vector k is chosen from [10,15,20,25,30]. We set the total number of iterations to T = 300, and the number of phaseless measurement m ranges from 20 to 1000 with interval 50.…”
Section: Results Of Random Target On Fully-connected Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average results are displayed in Figure 10b,c. One can see that the presented method is of good robustness against noise and a good stability at SNR > 10 dB when intensity measurement m < n. Compared with the classical imaging technology, the proposed method cannot reconstruct the targets that are not in the range of a generative model G as in [25,26,30], and its reconstruction results under high intensity measurements are not as perfect as other methods. However, it can use the prior information provided by the generative model to achieve the high-resolution reconstruction of targets with different sparseness when the intensity measurement m < n, which greatly reduces the complexity of solving the target scattering coefficient and the difficulty of hardware required for the echo signal detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, a number of iterative algorithms have been proposed for solving the problem in (2), which includes lifting-based convex methods, alternating minimization-based nonconvex methods, and greedy methods [6][7][8][9]. Our goal is to learn a set of illumination patterns to optimize the recovery of an alternating minimization (AltMin) algorithm for solving the problem in (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%