1973
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(73)90022-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternating direction implicit techniques for two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] These usually employ strongly implicit time advance algorithms, and are able to advance the solution accurately and stably over very large time steps. The advantage is that all the underlying physics is retained, the model remains valid across a wide range of parameters, the boundary conditions are obvious, and the same algorithm can be applied to a wide variety of problems pertaining to magnetized plasmas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] These usually employ strongly implicit time advance algorithms, and are able to advance the solution accurately and stably over very large time steps. The advantage is that all the underlying physics is retained, the model remains valid across a wide range of parameters, the boundary conditions are obvious, and the same algorithm can be applied to a wide variety of problems pertaining to magnetized plasmas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial numerical approximation of the transport equations is mainly based on the first and second-order upwind method for the convection and advection terms and a central difference for the diffusion ones [20]. The transport equation time approximation is based on a full implicit method for 1D modeling and the alternating direction implicit method for 2D modeling [21]. The numerical solution is a direct method [22].…”
Section: The Existing Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be reiterated that for this study, only the flow between two of the blades is computed, i.e., between the pressure side of one blade and the suction side of the next blade, because of periodicity. The cylindrical coordinates are transformed to align the blade and nacelle surfaces with various computational planes according to the following: 't f; n I; = = = = t f;(t,z,r,~) n(t,z,r,~) I;(t,z,r,~) (1) This generalized nonorthog~nal coordinate transformation maps the spinner and nacelle onto a constant n-plane and each side of the blade, i.e., the suction and pressure sides, onto parts of a constant I;-plane. The remaining parts of the constant I;-planes are periodic surfaces.…”
Section: Derivation Of Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) are: U, V, and Ware the contravariant velocities written without metric normalization. J is the transformation Jacobian and is defined below.…”
Section: Derivation Of Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%