2015
DOI: 10.1179/2051819615z.00000000032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternate Routes: Interpretive Trails, Resistance, and the View from East Jerusalem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inevitably, a trail is only a suggested route and there are visitors who will resist instructions, sabotage itineraries and subvert the hegemonic message of a themed route and indeed trails have been designed to encourage visitors to select elements of a story and compare historical themes with contemporary street culture (Shaw & MacLeod, 2000). Alternative trails can be offered as in the case of the City of David where an unofficial guidebook and tour are offered that challenge the signage, include the views of local residents and focus on a more critical approach to the complex history of Jerusalem than that presented in the official trail (Taylor, 2015). Such 'resistance strategies' at tourist trails have received little critical attention but would certainly repay further study as Taylor suggests (2015, p. 118).…”
Section: Trails and The Performance Of Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inevitably, a trail is only a suggested route and there are visitors who will resist instructions, sabotage itineraries and subvert the hegemonic message of a themed route and indeed trails have been designed to encourage visitors to select elements of a story and compare historical themes with contemporary street culture (Shaw & MacLeod, 2000). Alternative trails can be offered as in the case of the City of David where an unofficial guidebook and tour are offered that challenge the signage, include the views of local residents and focus on a more critical approach to the complex history of Jerusalem than that presented in the official trail (Taylor, 2015). Such 'resistance strategies' at tourist trails have received little critical attention but would certainly repay further study as Taylor suggests (2015, p. 118).…”
Section: Trails and The Performance Of Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In land-use conflicts, underlying conflicts may not be visible, such as power relations and unresolved historical legacies. One example and an interesting argument posed by Taylor [89] relating to this study is that the trail itself is a powerful place for representation and that, through attributes such as location, design, and signage for visitors, it becomes a coproducer of a landscape important to specific groups. In his study of an interpretive heritage trail in East Jerusalem, it became clear that, by bringing dominant narratives forward through the trail, it possesses the privilege of excluding other stories of the urban landscape.…”
Section: Conflicts Over Trails In a Multifunctional Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through processes of selection, organisation and interpretation, heritage walks indicate which sites are deemed 'worthy' of preservation, visitation and remembrance. As such, the walks can privilege particular perspectives over others, reflecting dominant historical narratives or an 'authorised heritage discourse', or, conversely, manifesting as subaltern projects (Smith, 2006) that present and legitimise alternative, marginalised or untold histories (Taylor, 2015;MacLeod, 2017;Barber, 2018). This article is concerned with self-guided, government-generated, purposive urban heritage walks on the Gold Coast, Australia.…”
Section: Conceptualising Heritage Walks Trails and Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%