1991
DOI: 10.1080/13854049108403299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternate form of the california verbal learning test: Development and reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The memory measures were chosen according to the following criterion: validated and commonly used measures with representative norms were preferred over laboratory tasks and measures that were less commonly used. The included measures were: the California Verbal Learning Test [27,28], the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test [29], other list recall tasks [30,31,32], the Visual Verbal Learning Test [33], the logical memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale [34], the Buschke Selective Reminding Test [35], the Guild Memory Test [36] and the Face-Name Task used by Andrewes et al [24]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The memory measures were chosen according to the following criterion: validated and commonly used measures with representative norms were preferred over laboratory tasks and measures that were less commonly used. The included measures were: the California Verbal Learning Test [27,28], the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test [29], other list recall tasks [30,31,32], the Visual Verbal Learning Test [33], the logical memory subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale [34], the Buschke Selective Reminding Test [35], the Guild Memory Test [36] and the Face-Name Task used by Andrewes et al [24]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most widely used tests is the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT; Delis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 1987), which evolved into several alternate forms (Delis, et al, 1991; Delis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 2000; Libon, Mattson et al, 1996; Delis, Kramer, Kaplan, & Ober, 1994). The multiple conditions of the CVLT allows for delineation of where verbal memory performance breaks down (e.g., encoding, storage, retrieval) and provides data reflecting different processes (e.g., learning slope, recall consistency, proactive and retroactive interference, learning strategy, perseveration, intrusions).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WHISCA ancillary study used a battery of measures designed to assess a broad range of domain-specific cognitive functions (emphasizing tests that were expected to be sensitive to aging or effects of hormones) and mood states. Included in the battery was the Primary Mental Abilities Vocabulary Test [13] to measure verbal knowledge, the Letter and Semantic Fluency Tests [14,15] to measure phonemic and category fluency, the Benton Visual Retention Test [16] to measure short-term figural memory and visuo-construction, the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) [17] to measure verbal learning and memory, the Digit Span Test [18] to measure attention and working memory, the Card Rotations Test [19] to measure spatial rotational ability, the Finger Tapping Test [20] to measure fine motor speed, the Positive and Negative Affectivity Schedule [21] to assess positive and negative mood states, and the short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale [22] to measure nonsomatic features of depressed mood. Table 1 provides additional details; see also Resnick et al [11] .…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%