2005
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternate day and daily administration of GnRH antagonist may prevent premature luteinization to a similar extent during FSH treatment

Abstract: Whether alternate day is as effective as daily administration of ganirelix in preventing premature luteinization should be addressed in a non-inferiority trial powered to evaluate live birth rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
25
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our patient population, the incidence of premature LH rise in first GnRH-antagonist IVF-ICSI cycles was 8%, almost sixfold higher than the incidence of 1.4% reported in the ganirelix dose-finding study at the 0.25 mg daily dose, which is currently used in practice (10). One possible reason for this finding is that most of the published literature to date on outcomes with GnRH-antagonist cycles comes from randomized, controlled trials, where a homogeneous patient population is selected, and older patients, patients with ovulatory dysfunction, and patients who are overweight are routinely excluded (1,4,6,7,15). Our data provide unique insight into a more generalized application of GnRH-antagonist protocols to a heterogeneous infertility population, suggesting that a premature LH rise is more frequent than originally anticipated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our patient population, the incidence of premature LH rise in first GnRH-antagonist IVF-ICSI cycles was 8%, almost sixfold higher than the incidence of 1.4% reported in the ganirelix dose-finding study at the 0.25 mg daily dose, which is currently used in practice (10). One possible reason for this finding is that most of the published literature to date on outcomes with GnRH-antagonist cycles comes from randomized, controlled trials, where a homogeneous patient population is selected, and older patients, patients with ovulatory dysfunction, and patients who are overweight are routinely excluded (1,4,6,7,15). Our data provide unique insight into a more generalized application of GnRH-antagonist protocols to a heterogeneous infertility population, suggesting that a premature LH rise is more frequent than originally anticipated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the degree of suppression with GnRH antagonist might not be adequate to maintain LH levels suppressed to a similar extent as the GnRH agonist group. The adequacy of LH suppression using the standard dose of 0.25 mg daily has been put in doubt recently (Messinis et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in stimulated intrauterine cycles, none of the 17 subjects with both an LH level >10 IU/L and a progesterone level >1.0 ng/mL became pregnant [4]. Among the 73 patients undergoing IVF stimulated with recombinant FSH, none of the seven patients with progesterone values >4 ng/mL became pregnant; however, five women with LH rises >10 IU/L without accompanying increase in progesterone became pregnant [18]. In donor oocyte cycles, where endometrium is spared from the negative effects of high progesterone, premature luteinization did not have a negative impact on oocyte and embryo quality [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%