2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2006.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered susceptibility of granary weevil Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations to insecticides after selection with pirimiphos-methyl and deltamethrin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the E3 population of granary weevil has the highest slope value and can be considered homogeneous. Similar to our findings, Kljajić & Perić (2007) reported that the resistance rates obtained for S. granarius in the Belgrade Harbor population after 24 hours of malathion exposure were 4.3-fold higher than in the susceptible population. It was also reported that the Apatin population developed a 3.2-fold resistance to malathion in granary weevil populations from different regions of Yugoslavia (Kljajić & Perić, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the other hand, the E3 population of granary weevil has the highest slope value and can be considered homogeneous. Similar to our findings, Kljajić & Perić (2007) reported that the resistance rates obtained for S. granarius in the Belgrade Harbor population after 24 hours of malathion exposure were 4.3-fold higher than in the susceptible population. It was also reported that the Apatin population developed a 3.2-fold resistance to malathion in granary weevil populations from different regions of Yugoslavia (Kljajić & Perić, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Maintaining pest prevention and control is an essential issue in reducing any type of damage (Kumar and Kalita, 2017). Various chemical pesticides such as malathion, bromophos, fenitrothion (Lemon, 1967), malathion, pirimiphos methyl (Shawir et al, 1988;Kljajićand Peric, 2007), cyfluthrin (Arthur, 1994;Arthur, 1998), thiamethoxam (Arthur et al, 2004), spinosad (Toews et al, 2003;Bonjour and Opit, 2010;Subramanyam et al, 2012), deltamethrin (Kljajićand Peric, 2007;Sehgal and Subramanyam, 2014;Ziaee and Babamir-Satehi, 2019), methoprene (Daglish and Wallbank, 2005;Athanassiou et al, 2011;Wijayaratne et al, 2012), and chlorfenapyr (Arthur, 2008;Arthur, 2009) have been used to control storedproduct beetles. For decades, the use of chemical pesticides was one of the main components of the integrated management of storage insect and mite pests, providing long-term protection of stored products (Hamel et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infestations do not only cause significant losses due to grain consumption, but also lead to high temperature and moisture conditions that accelerate growth of molds, including toxigenic species (Storey et al 1984;Magan et al 2003;Tripathi 2018). These storage pests are usually controlled with synthetic pesticides, which increases the risk of environmental pollution, insecticide residues, and pesticide resistance (Regev et al 1983;Guedes et al 1994;Kljajić and Perić 2007). In addition, legislation in many countries tends to limit the use of broad-spectrum contact insecticides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%