2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered structural connectivity is related to attention deficit/hyperactivity subtypes: A DTI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a number of differences were observed specific to subtype when compared to controls, with increased FA in the right cingulum in ADHD-C, and increased FA in ADHD-I involving regions linked to fronto–striatal–thalamic circuits and the cingulum bundle, which forms connections between the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes (Svatkova et al, 2016 ). The second study, by Ercan et al ( 2016a ) compared 24 ADHD-C and 24 ADHD-I children and adolescents with 24 controls and found increased RD bilaterally and increased AD in brain regions mostly on the left side linked to fronto–striato–cerebellar regions in ADHD-C than ADHD-I. The third study that used voxel-based analyses measured FA, RD, and AD values in children, aged 7–13 years old, and found significant differences in ADHD-C ( n = 28), relative to ADHD-I ( n = 28), involving the motor circuit, with increased FA and RD in the right thalamus, increased AD in the left postcentral gyrus and right caudate, and increased RD in the left postcentral gyrus and supplementary motor area (Lei et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, a number of differences were observed specific to subtype when compared to controls, with increased FA in the right cingulum in ADHD-C, and increased FA in ADHD-I involving regions linked to fronto–striatal–thalamic circuits and the cingulum bundle, which forms connections between the frontal, parietal and temporal lobes (Svatkova et al, 2016 ). The second study, by Ercan et al ( 2016a ) compared 24 ADHD-C and 24 ADHD-I children and adolescents with 24 controls and found increased RD bilaterally and increased AD in brain regions mostly on the left side linked to fronto–striato–cerebellar regions in ADHD-C than ADHD-I. The third study that used voxel-based analyses measured FA, RD, and AD values in children, aged 7–13 years old, and found significant differences in ADHD-C ( n = 28), relative to ADHD-I ( n = 28), involving the motor circuit, with increased FA and RD in the right thalamus, increased AD in the left postcentral gyrus and right caudate, and increased RD in the left postcentral gyrus and supplementary motor area (Lei et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the four DTI studies available to review examining the microstructural properties of WM tracts between ADHD subtypes, three studies used whole brain voxel-wise analysis whereby two of these studies employed tract-based spatial statistical (TBSS) analyses of FA, RD, AD (Ercan et al, 2016a ; Svatkova et al, 2016 ), and MD (Svatkova et al, 2016 ) diffusion properties, and one study analyzed FA, RD, and AD values using a voxel-based analysis (Lei et al, 2014 ). The fourth study utilized a whole brain connectome approach to map interregional brain connections using tractography and applied network-based statistic (NBS) analysis of FA values of these connections and also examined correlations of tract-averaged FA values and neuropsychological attention measures as a subsequent analysis (Hong et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouragingly, the results from those studies overlap with ours in finding widespread regions, including decreased FA with or without increased RD in overlapping regions. In contrast, other studies failed to identify any regional alteration, in either children or adults with ADHD compared with healthy controls, even with comparable sample sizes (Ercan et al, 2016;Yoncheva et al, 2016). Inconsistency might result from differences in scanning, data processing, and quality assurance protocols, differences in demographic characteristics of the participants, eg, age (Roalf et al, 2016), sex (Jacobson et al, 2015), medication history (de Luis-Garcia et al, 2015), as well as the heterogeneous nature of the disorder (Thapar and Cooper, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Growing evidence from both functional and structural connectivity studies highlight brain connectivity differences in ADHD and between subtypes, which extends support for specific key networks that may underlie the combined and inattentive types (Carmona et al, 2015, Park et al, 2016, Iannaccone et al, 2015, Wang and Li, 2015). Correspondingly, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies provide further support for distinct structural and white matter connectivity disturbances between the ADHD-C and ADHD-I subtype (Hong et al, 2014, Lei et al, 2014a, Svatkova et al, 2016, Ercan et al, 2016). A novel connectivity approach which complements both DTI and functional connectivity is connectivity mapping using the covariance of brain regional volumes (Singh et al, 2013, Griffiths et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%