2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2001.00308.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered inhibition of motor responses in Tourette Syndrome and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Abstract: The data are interpreted to indicate altered frontal inhibitory functions. Similarities and dissimilarities between the findings for TS and OCD are discussed with respect to other pathophysiologic aspects of the disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
55
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(51 reference statements)
10
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results showed that the 'no-go' were associated with a frontal shift of the so-called NGA 2 in the GTS, but not in the OCD group. With a comparable STOP-task, we also found results similar to Johannes et al, (Johannes, Wieringa et al, 2001a) where the NGA related to the stop/inhibition was larger over frontal areas in the GTS group even in the absence of OCD comorbidity (Thibault et al, 2009). This finding led to the hypothesis that an overactivated frontal inhibitory function is specific to GTS patients.…”
Section: Inhibitory and Sensorimotor Integration Specificity In Gtssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results showed that the 'no-go' were associated with a frontal shift of the so-called NGA 2 in the GTS, but not in the OCD group. With a comparable STOP-task, we also found results similar to Johannes et al, (Johannes, Wieringa et al, 2001a) where the NGA related to the stop/inhibition was larger over frontal areas in the GTS group even in the absence of OCD comorbidity (Thibault et al, 2009). This finding led to the hypothesis that an overactivated frontal inhibitory function is specific to GTS patients.…”
Section: Inhibitory and Sensorimotor Integration Specificity In Gtssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Using LRPs, the team of Johannes et coll. (Johannes, Wieringa et al, 2001b) failed to show any response-specific difference to GTS patients. In this paradigm, however, stimulus-locked LRPs were pooled across conditions and the peak amplitude was analyzed as a non-specific measure of motor processing, which may have reduced its sensitivity to detect any subtle motor processing differences.…”
Section: Cognitive Electrophysiology and Experimental Neuropsychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our sample size compares to earlier samples in the ERP field, which used GTS patients samples at n=6 (Van de Wetering et al, 1985), n=10 (Johannes et al, 2001a(Johannes et al, ,b, 2003, n=12 (Johannes et al, 1997) and n=24 (van Woerkom et al, 1994). The same applies with ERP studies of OCD patients with various sample sizes from a n=8 (Di Russo et al, 2000), n=9 (Gehring et al, 2000), n=13 (Morault et al, 1997), n=15 (Sanz et al, 2001) and n=21 (Morault et al, 1998).…”
Section: Possible Influences Of Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Behavioral level studies typically involve inhibition of motor responses and impulse control (e.g., Johannes et al, 2001). Cognitive level studies focus on the mental processes of attention and memory in contexts where unwanted thoughts or inappropriate meanings of ambiguous words have to be suppressed (e.g., Copland, Chenery, & Murdoch, 2000;Gernsbacher & Faust, 1991;Wegner, 1992;Wenzlaff & Wegner, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%