2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1355617715001034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Effective Connectivity during a Processing Speed Task in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract: Effective connectivity results reveal that MS individuals with processing speed impairment not only have connections that differ from healthy participants and MS individuals without processing speed impairment, but also have increased strengths of connections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although WM damage or deep GM atrophy were not identified as the most important predictors for IPS in our sample, we did observe that NCGMV could explain up to 26% of variance in IPS outside the scanner. With respect to sFC, we did not observe differences between pwMS and controls, whereas previous studies did show differences in DMN effective and stationary FC at rest and during an IPS task, both related to IPS ( Dobryakova et al, 2016 ; Wojtowicz et al, 2014 ). These contradictory findings might be explained by methodological differences, such as sample size and operationalization of FC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although WM damage or deep GM atrophy were not identified as the most important predictors for IPS in our sample, we did observe that NCGMV could explain up to 26% of variance in IPS outside the scanner. With respect to sFC, we did not observe differences between pwMS and controls, whereas previous studies did show differences in DMN effective and stationary FC at rest and during an IPS task, both related to IPS ( Dobryakova et al, 2016 ; Wojtowicz et al, 2014 ). These contradictory findings might be explained by methodological differences, such as sample size and operationalization of FC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The other study investigated the directionality of FC (i.e. effective FC) during IPS, which provides differential information than sFC, and is therefore difficult to compare ( Dobryakova et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, we normalized FC measures for whole-brain average FC, as this average FC can vary greatly between subjects and potentially drive differences between groups, which is not always performed in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, studies in MS samples have reported a decline in gait performance in response to adding a cognitive load vs. walking alone (Sosnoff et al, 2011; Doi et al, 2013; Learmonth et al, 2014; Downer et al, 2016). Indeed, such declines might be a product of cognitive problems associated with MS (Diamond et al, 1997; DeLuca et al, 2004a,b; Beckmann et al, 2005; Lengenfelder et al, 2006; Dobryakova et al, 2016), given that successful dual-tasking requires divided attention and the ability to process information simultaneously from multiple internal or external sources. Yet, there is equivocal evidence regarding the association between the dual-task cost of walking (DTCW; i.e., the reduction in walking performance under single- vs. dual-task conditions) and cognition in MS (Motl et al, 2014; Sosnoff et al, 2014; Kirkland et al, 2015; Sandroff et al, 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both tests have been recommended as the standardized tools for cognitive assessment in MS (19) and have been adapted to task-driven fMRI research. Studies have investigated effective functional connectivity among the test-specific regions and shown that information flow between two hemispheres is required for both SDMT and PASAT performance (20,21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%