1988
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered controls of proliferation in proximal small intestine of the senescent rat.

Abstract: The proximal small intestine responds to starvation by rapidly reducing crypt cell proliferation rate and villus cellularity and to resumption of food intake (refeeding) by abruptly increasing proliferation and the number of villus epithelial cells. We show that villus cellularity responds to starvation and refeeding similarly in young and aging animals. However, as compared to young animals, senescent rats showed increased basal DNA synthetic activity, starvation resulted in a smaller decrease in DNA labeling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, not only are there differences between species, but there are differences between tissues in their response to the dyotic signaling. For instance, in humans, while skin cells (fibroblasts) do display decreased cellular proliferation during senescence [Dimri et al, 1995], cell types such as colonic and prostatic cells display increased proliferation during senescence [Hermann and Berger, 1999;Holt et al, 1988;Saxena et al, 1995]. The different responses to the serum dyotic signal are due to tissuespecific hormone receptor expression patterns.…”
Section: Senescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, not only are there differences between species, but there are differences between tissues in their response to the dyotic signaling. For instance, in humans, while skin cells (fibroblasts) do display decreased cellular proliferation during senescence [Dimri et al, 1995], cell types such as colonic and prostatic cells display increased proliferation during senescence [Hermann and Berger, 1999;Holt et al, 1988;Saxena et al, 1995]. The different responses to the serum dyotic signal are due to tissuespecific hormone receptor expression patterns.…”
Section: Senescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, careful evaluation of jejunal biopsy specimens from healthy elderly volunteers shows that the anatomy of epithelial cells and the surface area does not differ from that found in the young [1] . In the rat, although villus cell numbers in the proximal small intestine are similar in the young and old, crypt cell numbers are greater in Fischer 344 rats over age 24 months [2] accompanied by increased epithelial cell proliferation [3] and altered controls of cell production [4] . Similar changes have been described in the human small bowel epithelium [5] .…”
Section: Structural and Functional Changes In The Small Intestinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochemical reactions could alter the metabolism of puta Dig Dis I997;I5:302-311tive carcinogens, change rates of epithelial cell proliferation or apoptosis, and alter absorp tion rates that might influence colonocyte concentrations of bioactive compounds. The replicative potential and rate of a tissue is believed to be an important factor that con tributes to carcinogenesis [20], In the rat, epi thelial cell proliferation is faster in the distal than in the proximal colon [21], A gradient for the concentration of ornithine decarboxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme of polyamine syn thesis, increases as one proceeds from proxi mal to distal colon [22]. Elevated ornithine decarboxylase levels are associated with hy perproliferation in the colonic mucosa [23].…”
Section: Biochemical Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%