2015
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered Colonic Bacterial Fermentation as a Potential Pathophysiological Factor in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Abstract: OBJECTIVES Dysbiosis leading to abnormal intestinal fermentation has been suggested as a possible etiological mechanism in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to investigate the location and magnitude of altered intestinal bacterial fermentation in IBS and its clinical subtypes. METHODS One hundred fourteen IBS patients who satisfied Rome III criteria and 33 healthy controls (HC) were investigated. Intestinal fermentation was assessed using two surrogate measures: intestinal intraluminal pH and fecal sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
85
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH of each fecal sample was assessed by inserting an electrode pH probe (pHSpear; Eutech Instruments, Thermo Fisher Scientific) into 3 different locations of each stool. With the use of sterile spatulas, small pieces of the stools were removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for later analysis of SCFA content (acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate) with the use of a Hewlett-Packard model 6890 gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector equipped with a 30 m, 0.53 mm ID capillary column, as previously described (18,19). Remaining fecal samples were weighed, and twice this weight in ultra-pure (Milli-Q) sterile water was added to each sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH of each fecal sample was assessed by inserting an electrode pH probe (pHSpear; Eutech Instruments, Thermo Fisher Scientific) into 3 different locations of each stool. With the use of sterile spatulas, small pieces of the stools were removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for later analysis of SCFA content (acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate) with the use of a Hewlett-Packard model 6890 gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector equipped with a 30 m, 0.53 mm ID capillary column, as previously described (18,19). Remaining fecal samples were weighed, and twice this weight in ultra-pure (Milli-Q) sterile water was added to each sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current evidence regarding the effect of the low FODMAP diet on SCFA is limited by conflicting findings between studies,44 48–50 small patient numbers, differences in study design and SCFA quantification methodology. Furthermore, stool SCFA concentration is not an accurate measure of in vivo SCFA production due to the effect of colonic transit time on SCFA absorption52 and stool volume on SCFA dilution,53 leading to variations across IBS subtypes 52. Importantly, without assessment of SCFA concentration at the major site of production in the ascending colon, which requires technically demanding and invasive techniques,54 it will be difficult to confirm the interaction between the low FODMAP diet, SCFA production and symptom provocation in IBS.…”
Section: The Low Fodmap Dietmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following assessment of starch fermentation in vitro, the microbiota of IBS patients produced more sulfides and hydrogen, and less butyrate, than those of healthy controls. Another study assessed intestinal fermentation in 114 patients with Rome III-defined IBS and 33 healthy controls, using intraluminal pH measured via wireless motility capsule, and levels of short-chain fatty acids in stool [47]. Colonic, but not small bowel, pH was significantly lower among IBS patients compared with controls, suggesting higher levels of colonic fermentation in IBS.…”
Section: Evidence For the Role Of Infections In Fgidmentioning
confidence: 99%