The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered CD161bright CD8+ Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT)-Like Cell Dynamics and Increased Differentiation States among Juvenile Type 1 Diabetics

Abstract: Type 1A diabetes (T1D) is believed to be caused by immune-mediated destruction of β-cells, but the immunological basis for T1D remains controversial. Microbial diversity promotes the maturation and activation of certain immune subsets, including CD161bright CD8+ mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, and alterations in gut mucosal responses have been reported in type 1 diabetics (T1Ds). We analyzed T cell populations in peripheral blood leukocytes from juvenile T1Ds and healthy controls. We found that pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MR1‐5‐OP‐RU tetramers now permit the identification of MAIT cells based on their MR1‐restricted TCR specificity. Because many clinical studies have used surrogate phenotyping techniques, and often only focus on CD8 + MAIT cells in their analysis, we felt it was important to determine how well these approaches compare to the use of MR1 tetramers to examine all MAIT cell populations. Here, we analyzed a large cohort of healthy human PBMC samples to both establish the phenotypic characteristics of human MAIT cells, and subsets thereof, using MR1‐5‐OP‐RU tetramers, as well as to establish a comparison of the use of MR1‐5‐OP‐RU tetramers with surrogate mAb‐based identification techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MR1‐5‐OP‐RU tetramers now permit the identification of MAIT cells based on their MR1‐restricted TCR specificity. Because many clinical studies have used surrogate phenotyping techniques, and often only focus on CD8 + MAIT cells in their analysis, we felt it was important to determine how well these approaches compare to the use of MR1 tetramers to examine all MAIT cell populations. Here, we analyzed a large cohort of healthy human PBMC samples to both establish the phenotypic characteristics of human MAIT cells, and subsets thereof, using MR1‐5‐OP‐RU tetramers, as well as to establish a comparison of the use of MR1‐5‐OP‐RU tetramers with surrogate mAb‐based identification techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAIT cells also appear to be perturbed in several noninfectious diseases, including autoimmunity, metabolic disorders and cancer, as well as viral infection . With growing interest in the field of MAIT cell biology, correct identification of MAIT cells is critical to determine their role in health and disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, MAIT cells are identified using anti-Vα7.2 TCR chain and anti-CD161 antibodies. A recent report analyzed that the CD161 bright CD8 + T cell subset in juvenile T1D patients ( 51 ), with the CD161 bright CD8 + T cells displaying a phenotype, IL-18Rα + , CD127 + , CD45RA − , and CCR7 − , suggestive of MAIT cells. No difference in the CD161 bright CD8 + T cell frequency was observed in juvenile T1D patients as compared to age-matched controls.…”
Section: Mait Cells In T1dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The notion that MAIT cell numbers and phenotype are influenced to a large extent by impairment of glucose metabolism is further supported by the correlation between MAIT cell numbers and their phenotype to the hemoglobin A1c levels in children with T1D. 18 Thus, it is possible that the increased MAIT cell activation and reduced circulating numbers observed in children with T1D may be directly linked to hyperglycemia rather than being part of the b-cell destructive process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%