2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2011703117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations of the gut ecological and functional microenvironment in different stages of multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, generally starts as the relapsing remitting form (RRMS), but often shifts into secondary progressive MS (SPMS). SPMS represents a more advanced stage of MS, characterized by accumulating disabilities and refractoriness to medications. The aim of this study was to clarify the microbial and functional differences in gut microbiomes of the different stages of MS. Here, we compared gut microbiomes of patients with RRMS, SPMS, and two clo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
63
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(87 reference statements)
8
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies revealed differences in the relative abundance of rare phyla in primary progressive MS patients compared to healthy controls [35]. Secondary progressive MS patients show a relative increase of the Streptococcuss genus, which was suggested to correlate with increased oxidative stress in the gut [36]. In contrast, the gut microbiota of relapsing remitting MS patients was characterized by decreased abundance of short‐chain fatty acid (SCFA) producing bacteria compared to healthy controls [36], confirming previous studies that demonstrated a relative contribution of microbial SCFAs during neuroinflammation [37].…”
Section: Relevance Of Microbial Changes In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These studies revealed differences in the relative abundance of rare phyla in primary progressive MS patients compared to healthy controls [35]. Secondary progressive MS patients show a relative increase of the Streptococcuss genus, which was suggested to correlate with increased oxidative stress in the gut [36]. In contrast, the gut microbiota of relapsing remitting MS patients was characterized by decreased abundance of short‐chain fatty acid (SCFA) producing bacteria compared to healthy controls [36], confirming previous studies that demonstrated a relative contribution of microbial SCFAs during neuroinflammation [37].…”
Section: Relevance Of Microbial Changes In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary progressive MS patients show a relative increase of the Streptococcuss genus, which was suggested to correlate with increased oxidative stress in the gut [36]. In contrast, the gut microbiota of relapsing remitting MS patients was characterized by decreased abundance of short‐chain fatty acid (SCFA) producing bacteria compared to healthy controls [36], confirming previous studies that demonstrated a relative contribution of microbial SCFAs during neuroinflammation [37]. Potential mechanisms of gut microbiota alterations in MS patients have been studied in the EAE model that might in part be transferred back to the human disease.…”
Section: Relevance Of Microbial Changes In Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examining downstream products of microbial metabolism might provide a species-independent assessment of the immune modulating activities of the gut microbiome. Recently, the composition of the gut microbiome was investigated alongside metabolomics, revealing decreased levels of the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) butyrate and propionate in the gut of MS patients 9 . In one study, the proportions of SCFA-producers Roseburia , Coprococcus and Blautia were reduced by between 2- and fivefold in patients with MS 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this point, the gut microbiome has been demonstrated in recent years to facilitate detection of disease [30][31][32][33][34]; classification of disease subtypes and progression stages [35][36][37]; prediction of clinical outcomes and treatment efficacy [38][39][40][41][42]; personalized nutrition by prediction of postprandial glycemic response [43][44][45];…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%