2005
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01107.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries

Abstract: Rates of restenosis vary with stent geometry, but whether stents affect spatial and temporal distributions of wall shear stress (WSS) in vivo is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that alterations in spatial WSS after stent implantation predict sites of NH in rabbit iliac arteries. Antegrade iliac artery stent implantation was performed under angiography, and blood flow was measured before casting 14 or 21 days after implantation. Iliac artery blood flow domains were obtained from three-dimensional microfocal X… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
126
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following coronary stent deployment, sites of aggressive neointimal hyperplasia also correspond to sites subjected to non-physiological flow conditions, and this has been attributed to increased endothelial dysfunction and permeability. 6,17,18,20,21,52,71,79,88 The hemodynamic impact of the investigated stents was evaluated in terms of the relative residence time distribution predicted upon the lumen surface during the third cardiac cycle. The RRT accounts for temporal variations in both the magnitude and the orientation of the instantaneous wall shear stress vector and is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Analysis Of Balloon-expandable Coronary Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following coronary stent deployment, sites of aggressive neointimal hyperplasia also correspond to sites subjected to non-physiological flow conditions, and this has been attributed to increased endothelial dysfunction and permeability. 6,17,18,20,21,52,71,79,88 The hemodynamic impact of the investigated stents was evaluated in terms of the relative residence time distribution predicted upon the lumen surface during the third cardiac cycle. The RRT accounts for temporal variations in both the magnitude and the orientation of the instantaneous wall shear stress vector and is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Analysis Of Balloon-expandable Coronary Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,17,18,20,21,52,71,79,88 In light of these observations, a significant body of research has been carried out in this area. Due to the difficulty involved in the evaluation of these phenomena in an in vivo setting however, a large portion of this research has been carried out using computational methods of analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of even minor asymmetries in stent deployment has been clearly demonstrated in vascular cross-sections from high-resolution histologic studies (LaDisa et al, 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Recent computational hemodynamic (CHD) studies on the effects of stents on arterial hemodynamics have generally used idealized mathematic modeling of the artery and superimposed stent. [12][13][14][15][16][17] These simulations have provided some useful information about the local WSS behavior near the struts and cell centers as a function of strut dimensions, stent porosity, and flow rates. Although more detailed analysis of flow over stent struts has been undertaken by using 2D models, 18 which have also been used to predict deposition rates for drug-eluting stents, 19 the importance of 3D hemodynamic behavior near the struts and wall has recently been recognized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies proved that neointima thickening (NT), which can lead to in-stent restenosis, is related to increased wall stress poststenting (Timmins et al, 2011) and to altered local fluid dynamics (e.g. low and oscillating wall shear stress; WSS) provoked by the stent presence within the coronary artery (LaDisa et al, 2005 andMalek et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%