2018
DOI: 10.1113/jp275833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations in the muscle force transfer apparatus in aged rats during unloading and reloading: impact of microRNA‐31

Abstract: In healthy muscle, the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex (DGC), the integrin/focal adhesion complex, intermediate filaments and Z-line proteins transmit force from the contractile proteins to the extracellular matrix. How loading and age affect these proteins is poorly understood. The experiments reported here sought to determine the effect of ageing on the force transfer apparatus following muscle unloading and reloading. Adult (9 months) and old (28 months) rats were subjected to 14 days of hindlimb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For these experiments as a result of reference gene instability, after first assessing total RNA per mg tissue and then taking the C t expression value, the mRNA was described relative to tissue weight and subsequently reported as the fold change relative to control muscles, as described previously (Heinemeier et al 2009). An analysis that has previously been used extensively by the group (Baehr et al 2016;Baehr et al 2017;Hughes et al 2018).…”
Section: Strength Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these experiments as a result of reference gene instability, after first assessing total RNA per mg tissue and then taking the C t expression value, the mRNA was described relative to tissue weight and subsequently reported as the fold change relative to control muscles, as described previously (Heinemeier et al 2009). An analysis that has previously been used extensively by the group (Baehr et al 2016;Baehr et al 2017;Hughes et al 2018).…”
Section: Strength Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…740424.50; Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The electroporation of DNA plasmids was then performed as described previously (Ebert et al 2010;Hughes et al 2018). Briefly, after 2 h of pretreatment with 0.4 U µL -1 of hyaluronidase, 20 µg of mIR RNAi or negative control plasmid was injected into the TA muscle in C57/BL6 male mice (12-16 weeks old, n = 5; purchased from Charles River Laboratories) and the hind limbs were placed between two-paddle electrodes and subjected to 10 pulses (20 ms) of 175 V cm -1 using an ECM-830 electroporator (BTX Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA).…”
Section: Muscle Specific Knockdown Of Ubr5 For Antibody Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed significant reductions in dystrophin protein content in Fbxl22 transfected muscles. Dystrophin is essential for lateral force transmission and protecting skeletal muscle from contraction-induced injury (29,(39)(40)(41). The alterations in these sarcomeric proteins coincided with the development of a degenerative muscle fiber phenotype in Fbxl22 transfected tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a result of reference gene instability, gene expression was normalized to tissue weight and subsequently reported as the fold change relative to control muscles, as described previously (67). This type of analysis has previously been used extensively by our group (40,52,53).…”
Section: Gene Expression By Quantitative Rt-pcr In Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primer sequences for genes of interest and reference genes across mouse, rat and human samples are included in As above, melt curve analysis at the end of the PCR cycling protocol yielded a single peak. For these experiments due to reference gene instability, after first assessing total RNA/mg tissue and then taking the ∆ Ct expression value, the mRNA was described relative to tissue weight, and then described as fold change relative to control muscles as previously described (Heinemeier et al, 2009) an analysis used extensively by the group previously (Baehr et al, 2016;Baehr et al, 2017;Hughes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Strength Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%