2012
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations in Protein Expression in Tree Shrew Sclera during Development of Lens-Induced Myopia and Recovery

Abstract: The DIGE procedure revealed new proteins whose abundance is altered during myopia development and recovery. Many of these are involved in cell-matrix adhesions, cytoskeleton, and transcriptional regulation and extend our understanding of the remodeling that controls the extensibility of the sclera. Reductions in these proteins during minus lens wear may produce the increased scleral viscoelasticity that results in faster axial elongation. Recovery is not a mirror image of lens-induced myopia-many protein level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It must be acknowledged that a ''yoking effect,'' between treated and contralateral control eyes, has been reported in other studies. 9 However, we compared the contralateral control eye data (refraction, vitreous chamber depth, and axial length) of the vehicle and the TIMP-2 groups and found no significant difference, suggesting that, in the current study, TIMP-2 treatment had no yoking effect in the control eyes. Based on previously published studies, 18 the dose of TIMP-2 delivered subconjunctivally was estimated to result in a concentration of approximately 70 nM in the 7-mm button of tree shrew sclera, which is approximately 3.5 to 7 times the IC 50 value of MMP-2 activation.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…It must be acknowledged that a ''yoking effect,'' between treated and contralateral control eyes, has been reported in other studies. 9 However, we compared the contralateral control eye data (refraction, vitreous chamber depth, and axial length) of the vehicle and the TIMP-2 groups and found no significant difference, suggesting that, in the current study, TIMP-2 treatment had no yoking effect in the control eyes. Based on previously published studies, 18 the dose of TIMP-2 delivered subconjunctivally was estimated to result in a concentration of approximately 70 nM in the 7-mm button of tree shrew sclera, which is approximately 3.5 to 7 times the IC 50 value of MMP-2 activation.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…After 2 days of LIM, scleral gene expression is altered; a scleral GO signature is found (Guo et al, 2013) and creep rate is elevated (Siegwart, Jr. & Norton, 1999). Very similar, somewhat stronger gene expression changes are found after four days of LIM (Frost & Norton, 2012; Guo et al, 2013) and scleral creep rate reaches a peak at this time (Siegwart, Jr. & Norton, 1999). After 11 days of LIM, the eyes have fully compensated for the minus lens but scleral viscoelasticity remains slightly elevated (Siegwart, Jr. & Norton, 1999) and some gene expression differences remain in the sclera (Guo, personal communication, 2013) suggesting the presence of STAY signals in the choroid at this time point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Previous studies of mRNA and protein levels in tree shrew sclera have found alterations in expression levels not only in the treated eyes, but also in the untreated fellow control eyes when compared with age-matched normal eyes (Frost & Norton, 2012; Gao et al., 2011). Because (unpaired) comparisons of expression between groups of animals are less sensitive than (paired) comparisons between the two eyes within an animal, fewer significant differences are typically detected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, tree shrews at similar ages that recover from an induced myopia begin recovery with elongated eyes and scleras that have altered protein levels, mRNA levels and biomechanical properties. (Siegwart and Norton 1999, Frost and Norton 2012, Guo, Frost et al 2012, Guo, Frost et al 2013, Grytz and Siegwart 2015). The effectiveness of the red light in slowing axial elongation in eyes with normal scleras suggests that elongated eyes (an “eye-size” factor) does not explain the difference between the lack of response to plus lens wear and the recovery response when a minus lens is removed after compensation has occurred.…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siegwart and Norton (2010) suggested that, in a normal-size eye, the emmetropization mechanism may not be able to slow axial elongation below a genetically pre-programmed minimum amount. In contrast, in an eye that has been elongated after minus lens wear, the sclera has undergone remodeling of the extracellular matrix and has altered protein and mRNA levels (Siegwart and Norton 1999, Frost, Guo et al 2012, Guo, Frost et al 2013, Grytz and Siegwart 2015). The altered sclera may respond to the signals from the emmetropization mechanism although normal sclera cannot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%