2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations in cancer stem-cell marker CD44 expression predict oncologic outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas

Abstract: Institutional and national TCGA data show the association of elevated baseline CD44 expression with worse STS outcomes. Further study of CD44 as a possible novel STS biomarker appears indicated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CD44 is involved in cellular differentiation and migration, and abnormal expression of CD44 in cancer and sarcoma cells may promote invasion and lead to local recurrence and distant metastases (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). In the present study, enhanced expression of CD44s was found to be a poor prognostic factor for local recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CD44 is involved in cellular differentiation and migration, and abnormal expression of CD44 in cancer and sarcoma cells may promote invasion and lead to local recurrence and distant metastases (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). In the present study, enhanced expression of CD44s was found to be a poor prognostic factor for local recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Conflicting results regarding the expression of CD44 in sarcoma have been reported. Although poor prognosis is associated with the overexpression of CD44v6, a variant form of CD44, discrepant results have been reported for CD44s (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Some studies of various types of soft tissue sarcoma have reported that high expression of CD44, including both standard and unknown forms, is likely to have adverse effects on prognosis, distant metastasis, and local recurrence, whereas other studies have reported good prognosis in patients with increased CD44s expression (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, its potential value to discriminate CSCs sub-populations in STS is very limited and it has been reported that this cell surface marker could not be a useful tool to isolate CSCs in STS [31]. Nonetheless, elevated levels of CD44 expression were associated with worse outcome in STS; however, and since CD44 has pleotropic cellular functions, this association might be unrelated to the stem-like behavior of CD44+ STS cells [32].…”
Section: Cd44mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have linked the expression of CD44, one of the HA receptors, with the CSC phenotype, thus converting this protein in a potential therapeutic target [106]. High CD44 expression was associated with worse outcome in STS [32]. Current therapeutic approaches include neutralizing antibody, peptide mimetic, aptamers, natural compounds suppressing CD44 expression, targeting HA by bio-conjugates and nanoparticles, CD44 decoys, and HA oligomers.…”
Section: Targeting the Tumor Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSCs within tumor bulk display the capacity to self-renew, differentiate, and give rise to a new tumor (Visvader and Lindeman 2012 ). Recently, lots of surface markers of CSCs have been identified, including CD133, CD13, CD24, ALDH1A1, CD44, and so on (Henderson et al 2018 ; Li et al 2018 ; Marotta et al 2011 ; Organista-Nava et al 2014 ; Yang et al 2014 ). It is still a general strategy to isolate CSCs by FACS and to examine their biological features.…”
Section: Biological Characteristics and Study Strategies Of Cscsmentioning
confidence: 99%