1991
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8547(91)80122-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alteration of the ion-optic lens configuration to eliminate mass-dependent matrix-interference effects in inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elle résulte des effets de charge se produisant dans des régions de l'appareil à faible champ électrostatique (Ross et Hieftje 1991, Niu et Houk 1996 et produit un transport préférentiel des isotopes lourds dans l'analyseur. Elle est forte (1%/amu) et à peu près constante pour chaque élément.…”
Section: Iii23 La Discrimination De Masseunclassified
“…Elle résulte des effets de charge se produisant dans des régions de l'appareil à faible champ électrostatique (Ross et Hieftje 1991, Niu et Houk 1996 et produit un transport préférentiel des isotopes lourds dans l'analyseur. Elle est forte (1%/amu) et à peu près constante pour chaque élément.…”
Section: Iii23 La Discrimination De Masseunclassified
“…On a given ICPMS instrument, non-spectroscopic interferences have been found to depend on the lens configuration and settings, [9][10][11] the plasma operating conditions, 12 the ion sampling interface 7,13,14 and the sample introduction system. 15,16 In fact, removing the spray chamber altogether, through the use of a direct injection nebulizer, significantly reduced non-spectroscopic interference effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MC-ICP-MS, little mass fractionation occurs during ionization because the ionization efficiencies approach 100% (~ less than 1% in the TIMS) (White et al, 2000). Mass fractionation in the MC-ICP-MS is thought to result from space-charge effects in the low electrostatic field regions of the instrument; as the ion beam expands, lighter ions migrate to the exterior of the plasma and are focused less efficiently in the mass analyzer (Ross and Hieftje, 1991;Marechal et al, 1999;Niu and Houk, 1996;Hirata, 1996;White et al, 2000).…”
Section: Mass Fractionation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called matrix effect within the ICP-MS is poorly understood and is thought to vary from one instrument to another. Ross and Hieftje (1991) showed apparent matrix-induced interferences on ion intensities. White et al (2000) proposed that the relatively large standard deviation of real rock analysis might be partially caused by matrix effect; impurities in the analyte Almost perfect linear correlations are unexpected if both correction procedures were perfect as there should be a single value with random errors about the means, but the within-error (±2σ) correlations demonstrate that the simple linear correction is adequate.…”
Section: Matrix Effect and Dilution Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%