Alteration ofArabidopsis SLAC1promoter and its association with natural variation in drought tolerance

Abstract

Natural variation for drought tolerance is a major issue in adaptation and geographic distribution of terrestrial plants. Despite the importance, little is known about the genes and molecular mechanisms that determine its naturally occurring diversity. We analyzed the intraspecific drought tolerance variation between 2 accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana, Columbia (Col)-0 and Wassilewskija (Ws)-2. Measurement of weight loss in detached seedlings demonstrated a clear difference between drought-tolerant Col-0 and drought-sensitive Ws-2. They also differed in their stomatal response under drought condition. Using a quantitative genetic approach, we found a significant quantitative locus on chromosome 1. Surveying in the locus, we extrapolated that the SLAC1 gene, which is associated with stomatal closure, was likely responsible for the difference of drought tolerance. Comparison of their nucleotide and amino acid sequences revealed that there were few differences in regions encoding SLAC1 protein but was a large deletion in SLAC1 promoter of Ws-2. Histochemical GUS staining showed that the SLAC1 expressed dominantly in guard cells of Col-0, but did less in guard cells of Ws-2. Quantitative PCR analysis also showed that transcript level of SLAC1 in guard cells was higher in Col-0 than in Ws-2. The SLAC1 transcription analyses indicate low accumulation of SLAC1 in guard cells of Ws-2. When taken together, our results suggest that the low drought tolerance of Ws-2 was associated with the deletion of the promoter region of Ws-2 SLAC1.

Enhanced Stomatal Conductance by a Spontaneous Arabidopsis Tetraploid, Me-0, Results from Increased Stomatal Size and Greater Stomatal Aperture

“…Additionally, we found three ecotypes of Arabidopsis, Köln-4, Gabelstein-0, and Chisdra-1, that have particularly low CO 2 responses among 374 ecotypes and seem to be regulated by a common response mechanism (Takahashi et al, 2015). Moreover, there are natural variations in stomatal response to environmental stimuli (Bouchabke et al, 2008;Brosché et al, 2010;Imai et al, 2015) and in stomatal anatomy (Woodward et al, 2002;Russo et al, 2010;Delgado et al, 2011). These reports suggest that natural accessions provide valuable information for understanding actual stomatal adaptation mechanisms that cannot be obtained from only the study of mutants or transformants.…”

Natural Genetic Resources from Diverse Plants to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants

“…Arabidopsis thaliana accessions (ecotypes) are broadly distributed to the various regions of the world, and this distribution contributes to the genetic variations of Arabidopsis that are crucial for stress adaptation [ 48 ]. Thus, genetic variations among the Arabidopsis accessions provide a valuable genetic model to find out both unique stress tolerance mechanisms and important stress-tolerant alleles [ 49 ]. For example, Jha et al found a positive correlation between AtAVP1 transcript levels and salinity tolerance [ 50 ].…”

Alternative splicing as a driver of natural variation in abscisic acid response

“…However, an increasing number of reports in the last decades makes use of collections of locally adapted natural variants, that is, ecotypes, to unravel the genetic variations underlying the diversity in the response to stress, namely, in the many Arabidopsis accessions available, an invaluable resource that has allowed the identification of novel players in plant stress tolerance (Assmann, 2013; Yolcu et al., 2020). Both quantitative trait locus analyses and genome‐wide association studies have uncovered great variability in the response to ABA‐mediated stresses, including drought (Bouchabke et al., 2008; Des Marais et al., 2012; Imai et al., 2015; Kalladan et al., 2017, 2019; McKhann et al., 2004), high salinity (Baxter et al., 2010; DeRose‐Wilson & Gaut, 2011; Galpaz & Reymond, 2010; Julkowska et al., 2016; Katori et al., 2010; Quesada et al., 2002), and freezing temperatures (Gery et al., 2011; McKhann et al., 2008). An early microarray analysis (Chen et al., 2005) had already shown that most of the genes differentially expressed among Arabidopsis ecotypes were related to transcription and stress response, and indeed plants undergo significant transcriptional changes upon stress perception, with ABA specifically affecting approximately 10% of the Arabidopsis genome (Kreps et al., 2002; Song et al., 2016).…”