2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-011-0871-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alteration of brain viscoelasticity after shunt treatment in normal pressure hydrocephalus

Abstract: The results indicate the fundamental role of altered viscoelastic properties of brain tissue during disease progression and tissue repair in NPH. Clinical improvement in NPH is associated with an increasing complexity of the mechanical network whose inherent strength, however, remains degraded.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hemodynamic evaluations have already shown a higher cerebral blood flow in patients with iNPH 7,8 . Another theoretical statement is the linkage between perfusion and function, but also depending in increasing complexity of the neural network after shunting [9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemodynamic evaluations have already shown a higher cerebral blood flow in patients with iNPH 7,8 . Another theoretical statement is the linkage between perfusion and function, but also depending in increasing complexity of the neural network after shunting [9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[117][118][119] In these soft tissues, the macroscopic mechanical behavior (stiffness) has highly correlated changes in the tissue composition and structure identified by histology on a microscopic scale. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that changes in the structure and composition of engineered cartilage during growth will alter the MRE-derived stiffness.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Elastographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 5). Viscoelastic behavior of brain tissue has been reported in a number of studies, 8,9,13,20,24,26,29 but standard methods for calculating the R 0 do not take viscoelasticity into account. Taken together, these observations support our hypothesis that the clinically observed underestimation of R 0 is due to methods that do not account for the viscoelasticity of the brain.…”
Section: Possible Causes Of Underestimation Of the Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,18,26 Chang es of viscoelastic properties in hydrocephalic patients have been characterized by the latter method both before and after shunting. 9 On the basis of these data, we hypothesized that viscoelasticity plays a role in the ICP response and that neglecting the contributions of viscoelastic behavior is re sponsible for, or substantially contributes to, the underesti mation of the R 0 by the bolus infusion method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%