2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00339-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alteration in plasma levels of nonprotein sulfhydryl compounds and S-nitrosothiols in chronic renal failure patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Wlodek et al (22) observed plasma S-nitrosothiol concentrations different from those observed in our study, but they used L-cysteine to obtain a standard calibration curve, whereas we used reduced glutathione to obtain the calibration curve. A direct comparison of the results obtained with the two methods is therefore difficult.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, Wlodek et al (22) observed plasma S-nitrosothiol concentrations different from those observed in our study, but they used L-cysteine to obtain a standard calibration curve, whereas we used reduced glutathione to obtain the calibration curve. A direct comparison of the results obtained with the two methods is therefore difficult.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Because these groups did not measure and did not consider nitrite concentration, there is reasonable doubt about the value of these measurements (Tsikas, 2003;Tsikas and Frölich, 2003;. Furthermore both groups (i.e., Massy et al, 2003;Wlodek et al, 2003) have used the same method (i.e., Marzinzig et al, 1997) to measure S-nitrosothiols in plasma, but the S-nitrosothiol basal levels measured in their control groups differed almost by a factor of 20, namely 8.8 µM (Wlodek et al, 2003) and 0.45 µM (Massy et al, 2003). Regardless of these analytical problems and identified pitfalls, the same method has been used in a prospective study (Massy et al, 2004) that has revealed increased plasma S-nitrosothiol concentration to predict cardiovascular outcomes in end-stage renal disease patients (for discussion, see ; see also Section 11.3.2).…”
Section: Interference Of Nitrite and Nitrate In The Measurement Of S-mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Application of such an assay (i.e., use of ammonium sulfamate at almost neutral pH value) to quantify S-nitrosothiols in human serum and cell culture media revealed S-nitrosothiol levels that were almost identical with those of nitrite (Marzinzig et al, 1997), strongly suggesting that this method is not specific for S-nitrosothiols but actually measures nitrite plus S-nitrosothiols. Nevertheless, this method has been applied by other groups (Massy et al, 2003;Wlodek et al, 2003), apparently without any modification of the original method (Marzinzig et al, 1997), to measure S-nitrosothiols in plasma of patients suffering from chronic renal diseases. Because these groups did not measure and did not consider nitrite concentration, there is reasonable doubt about the value of these measurements (Tsikas, 2003;Tsikas and Frölich, 2003;.…”
Section: Interference Of Nitrite and Nitrate In The Measurement Of S-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations