SAE Technical Paper Series 2009
DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-2533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALSSAT Development Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use this requirement to calculate the prepackaged food requirements of the two transit legs of each mission scenario, as well as the extra 50 or 500 days of food for surface operations in Scenarios 1 and 2 respectively. Given published infrastructure costs 13 associated with a Mars Surface Habitat Vehicle 20 , we calculate ESM through consideration of the food subsystem including food, packaging, refrigeration 13,20 , and processing. Compare this case to a long-duration mission scenario in which food is grown during surface operations, in which literature suggests that a sizable initial hardware set would be required 13 .…”
Section: Segmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use this requirement to calculate the prepackaged food requirements of the two transit legs of each mission scenario, as well as the extra 50 or 500 days of food for surface operations in Scenarios 1 and 2 respectively. Given published infrastructure costs 13 associated with a Mars Surface Habitat Vehicle 20 , we calculate ESM through consideration of the food subsystem including food, packaging, refrigeration 13,20 , and processing. Compare this case to a long-duration mission scenario in which food is grown during surface operations, in which literature suggests that a sizable initial hardware set would be required 13 .…”
Section: Segmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, ESM remains the standard metric for evaluating ALS technology development 9,11,12 and systems [13][14][15][16] . It has been adopted for use in trade studies [17][18][19] , as the the metric for life support sizing [20][21][22] , and has been incorporated into several tools [23][24][25] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food, medicine, and gas exchange to sustain humans imposes important ECLSS feasibility constraints (Yeh et al, 2005;Yeh et al, 2009;Weber and Schnaitmann, 2016). These arise from a crewmember (CM) physiological profile, with an upper-bound metabolic rate of ∼ 11-13 MJ/CM-sol that can be satisfied through prepackaged meals and potable water intake of 2.5 kg/CM-sol (Liskowsky and Seitz, 2010;Anderson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Feasibility Needs and Mission Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements for sustaining a human population in terms of food, medicine, and gas exchange can impose important feasibility constraints [25][26][27] on the closed-loop life support system. The chief feasibility constraints are driven by the physiological profile of a crewmember (CM), with an upper-bound metabolic rate of ∼11-13 MJ/CM-sol that can be satisfied through prepackaged meals and potable water intake of 2.5 kg/CM-sol 28,29 .…”
Section: Feasibility Needs and Mission Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%