2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25190-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALS Population Assessment of a Dynamic Stopping Algorithm Implementation for P300 Spellers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spelled letter was identified as the intersection between the row and the column exhibiting the maximum of the sum of scored features (Krusienski et al, 2006 ). As mentioned in the Introduction section, the stimulation sequences were not customized for each patient and thus we performed a static data collection (Mainsah et al, 2015 ). Specifically, a single item (e.g., letter) was intensified 20 times (10 sequences) before the next set of stimuli would start.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spelled letter was identified as the intersection between the row and the column exhibiting the maximum of the sum of scored features (Krusienski et al, 2006 ). As mentioned in the Introduction section, the stimulation sequences were not customized for each patient and thus we performed a static data collection (Mainsah et al, 2015 ). Specifically, a single item (e.g., letter) was intensified 20 times (10 sequences) before the next set of stimuli would start.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm resulted in significant improvements in accuracy and spelling speed for healthy participants. These results were validated in a study with participants with ALS, one of the target populations for P300 spellers [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Healthy participants were presented with a 9×8 grid of characters on a computer screen while participants with communication disabilities were presented with a 6×6 grid of characters (see figure 2). These grids match the grids used in Throckmorton et al [16] and Mainsah et al [17] for participants without disability and with ALS, respectively. Both grids were flashed based on the checkerboard paradigm to eliminate character adjacency and double flash errors [20].…”
Section: P300 Speller Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locked-in patients typically have little to no voluntary muscle control but retain cognition and awareness [29][30][31][32][33]. Although methods exist to provide basic communicative capabilities to locked-in patients [33][34][35][36] and are associated with increases in patient-reported quality of life [31,32], these approaches often involve tedious and difficult to learn procedures such as selecting characters one at a time at rates less than ten characters per minute (typing rates are typically more than 175 characters per minute in healthy individuals). Development of a device capable of directly interpreting intended speech from neural activity could result in significant improvements to the speed and naturalness of assistive speech technology and, as a result, the quality of life for impaired patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%