2006 15th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Distributed Computing
DOI: 10.1109/hpdc.2006.1652159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALPS: An Application-Level Proportional-Share Scheduler

Abstract: ALPS is a per-application user-level proportional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…User-level scheduling [14] and ALPS [15] control UNIX processes from a scheduler process by using signals such as SIGSTOP and SIGCONT. User-level sandboxing [6] restricts the CPU usage of processes by changing the priorities of threads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User-level scheduling [14] and ALPS [15] control UNIX processes from a scheduler process by using signals such as SIGSTOP and SIGCONT. User-level sandboxing [6] restricts the CPU usage of processes by changing the priorities of threads.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newhouse and Pasquale 14) developed a user-level scheduler that allows the user to con-trol the CPU time. Neither of these supports the control of the disk bandwidth.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the user-level scheduler that Newhouse et al proposed 14) controls the CPU time at the userlevel, whereas idletime scheduler 8) controls the network and disk I/O at the kernel-level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate the need to replace OS, many techniques have been developed that enable us to build resource management policies on "as is" operating systems. Newhouse et al [18] have shown that a user-level CPU scheduler for CPU intensive jobs can be implemented on unmodified FreeBSD. Graybox techniques [2] facilitate the development of OS-like services at the user-level by inferring an OS internal state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%