2022
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac6e37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alphabet of one-loop Feynman integrals *

Abstract: In this paper, we present the universal structure of the alphabet of one-loop Feynman integrals. The letters in the alphabet are calculated using the Baikov representation with cuts. We consider both convergent and divergent cut integrals, and find that letters in the divergent cases can be easily obtained from the convergent cases by taking certain limits. The letters are written as simple expressions in terms of various Gram determinants. The knowledge of the alphabet makes it easy to construct the canonical… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3.31) These integrals have been observed to be pure integrals [93,94] for D 0 even, see also [95][96][97] for earlier results with ϵ = 0. Note that both the overall sign of the above equation, as well as the choice of branch for the square root, are a matter of choice of convention.…”
Section: Verification Through Differential Equations and Comparison W...mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3.31) These integrals have been observed to be pure integrals [93,94] for D 0 even, see also [95][96][97] for earlier results with ϵ = 0. Note that both the overall sign of the above equation, as well as the choice of branch for the square root, are a matter of choice of convention.…”
Section: Verification Through Differential Equations and Comparison W...mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Based on the Baikov representation of Feynman integrals, a similar analysis of canonical differential equations and symbol alphabets, also working out the divergent cases in more detail, was carried out in [94]. The later and original analyses agree on the form of the letters associated to the maximal cut, and in order to avoid redundant letters coming from individual determinant factors of the principal A-determinant, for our rational letters (3.23) we have chosen those ratios that coincide with them (up to immaterial constant normalization factors).…”
Section: Jhep10(2023)161mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To translate the canonical differential equations into dlog form, we have constructed the hexagon alphabet from the previously known one-mass five-point alphabet [9,15] and the by now well-understood recursive structure of one-loop alphabets [51]. By imposing the absense of non-physical singularities, we have then determined the boundary values for the hexagon family for a judiciously chosen point in the Euclidean region.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional ten letters, appearing for the first time in the hexagon integral, are obtained following the construction of one-loop alphabet letters from [51]. The letters involving square roots can be written in the form…”
Section: One-loop Hexagon Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For applying the method of canonical differential equation, finding a corresponding UT basis is not a trivial task. There are many methods and algorithms designed for determining a UT basis, including the leading singularity analysis [21,22,27], the Magnus and Dyson Series [45], the dlog integrand construction [46][47][48][49], the intersection theory [50][51][52][53], the initial algorithm [54], the Lee's algorithm [55][56][57] and so on. Based on these methods or algorithms, some public available packages were designed including Canonica [58,59],…”
Section: Ut Integral Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%