2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alpha-decay of deformed superheavy nuclei as a probe of shell closures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many works, b eff is taken as a constant equal to 0.99-1 fm (equivalently a eff = 0.54 fm) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. In previous work with Abdul-latif, it was found that such an approximation yields unacceptable errors [19].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many works, b eff is taken as a constant equal to 0.99-1 fm (equivalently a eff = 0.54 fm) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. In previous work with Abdul-latif, it was found that such an approximation yields unacceptable errors [19].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A priori, one should not expect the effective diffuseness parameter a eff for the proximity potential and the diffuseness parameter for WS potential a WS to be equal or even play the same logical roles; this is owing to the different functional forms of the two potentials. To be more precise, consider the undeformed WS potential [1] V…”
Section: Diffuseness and Half-life For Proximity Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, within the theoretical framework of nuclear physics, especially in α decay of super heavy nuclei (SHN), there are points of intersection and divergence between different models used in calculations. Particularly, points of disagreement abound, including the particular functional form of nuclear interaction between α/cluster and the daughter nuclei, be it given by Woods-Saxon (WS) potential [1], double folding model (DFM) [2,3], liquid drop model (LDM) [4], universal proximity potential [5,6] and et cetera. Another point of disagreement stems from two competing proposals for α decay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can find in the list of approaches: cluster model [34], generalized density-dependent cluster model [35,36], modified two-potential approach for deformed nuclei by constructing the microscopic doublefolding potential [30], density-dependent cluster model using a two-potential approach [31], density-dependent M3Y effective interaction [37,38], generalized liquid drop model [39], unified model for α decay and α capture [40,41]. In particular, the inclusion of nuclear deformation in the α decay calculations is important since most of the α emitters have deformed shapes; this has been accounted in various way [40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Recently, the effective radial potential between the axially symmetric deformed daughter nucleus and the α particle has been considered as sum of the deformed Woods-Saxon nuclear potential, of the deformed Coulomb potential, of the centrifugal potential, and also taking into account the quadrupole and the hexade-capole deformation parameters of the daughter nucleus [51].…”
Section: The Rare α Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%