Abstract:Alopecia totalis (AT) and universalis (AU) represent the most severe subtypes of alopecia areata with more dramatic features and worse prognosis. The goal of this review is to identify all studies with long‐term prognostic data on patients with AT and AU and provide a long‐term outcome estimate. The PubMed database was queried to identify all articles discussing the long‐term prognosis of AT and AU. A total of nine articles discussing long‐term recovery rates of AT and AU were identified. The articles describe… Show more
“…Eligible patients were adults (aged C 18 years) or adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of AA and who had experienced at least 6 weeks of hair loss. In addition, recruitment targets were applied to achieve a mix of participants with the following conditions: C 25% scalp hair loss as measured by the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) [9] within the past 30 days; alopecia totalis (AT), defined as complete (100%) scalp hair loss; and alopecia universalis (AU), defined as complete (100%) scalp, facial, and body hair loss [10][11][12]. Patients were ineligible if they were participating in a clinical trial, undergoing treatment with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor in the past 90 days, or had other forms of alopecia.…”
Introduction: Individuals with alopecia areata (AA) may experience significant impacts on their health-related quality of life. The novel Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) questionnaire has been developed to assess hair loss signs, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations associated with AA. The objective of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties and establish scoring of the AAPPO in adults and adolescents with AA. Methods: Scoring and measurement properties of the AAPPO were examined using baseline and 2-week follow-up data from a prospective, noninterventional, web-based study of 121 patients with AA (85 adults aged C 18 years, 36 adolescents aged 12-17 years) with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) C 25% scalp hair loss. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported four single Hair Loss (HL) items, an Emotional Symptoms domain (ES; 4 items), and an Activity Limitations domain (AL; 3 items). Among all patients, the multi-item ES and AL domains had strong internal consistency (a C 0.87); all HL items and domain scores had strong test-retest reliability (weighted kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients C 0.78). All HL item scores demonstrated strong construct validity (r C 0.52) compared with the patient-reported Alopecia Areata Symptom and Impact Scale (AASIS) hair loss subscale score; ES and AL domain scores exhibited strong construct validity (r C 0.66) compared with the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Using SALT scores, HL mean item scores were better (lower) in the 25-49% SALT subgroup versus those with highest SALT scores (76-100%); however, ES mean domain scores were better in the SALT 76-100% subgroup in the same comparison (p \ 0.0001). Using AASIS and MCS score-created subgroups, ES and AL mean domain scores demonstrated hypothesized differences across subgroups (all p values \ 0.0001).
Conclusion:The AAPPO questionnaire is a reliable, valid disease-specific measure of hair loss severity and impact in individuals with AA.
“…Eligible patients were adults (aged C 18 years) or adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of AA and who had experienced at least 6 weeks of hair loss. In addition, recruitment targets were applied to achieve a mix of participants with the following conditions: C 25% scalp hair loss as measured by the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) [9] within the past 30 days; alopecia totalis (AT), defined as complete (100%) scalp hair loss; and alopecia universalis (AU), defined as complete (100%) scalp, facial, and body hair loss [10][11][12]. Patients were ineligible if they were participating in a clinical trial, undergoing treatment with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor in the past 90 days, or had other forms of alopecia.…”
Introduction: Individuals with alopecia areata (AA) may experience significant impacts on their health-related quality of life. The novel Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes (AAPPO) questionnaire has been developed to assess hair loss signs, emotional symptoms, and activity limitations associated with AA. The objective of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties and establish scoring of the AAPPO in adults and adolescents with AA. Methods: Scoring and measurement properties of the AAPPO were examined using baseline and 2-week follow-up data from a prospective, noninterventional, web-based study of 121 patients with AA (85 adults aged C 18 years, 36 adolescents aged 12-17 years) with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) C 25% scalp hair loss. Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported four single Hair Loss (HL) items, an Emotional Symptoms domain (ES; 4 items), and an Activity Limitations domain (AL; 3 items). Among all patients, the multi-item ES and AL domains had strong internal consistency (a C 0.87); all HL items and domain scores had strong test-retest reliability (weighted kappa or intraclass correlation coefficients C 0.78). All HL item scores demonstrated strong construct validity (r C 0.52) compared with the patient-reported Alopecia Areata Symptom and Impact Scale (AASIS) hair loss subscale score; ES and AL domain scores exhibited strong construct validity (r C 0.66) compared with the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score. Using SALT scores, HL mean item scores were better (lower) in the 25-49% SALT subgroup versus those with highest SALT scores (76-100%); however, ES mean domain scores were better in the SALT 76-100% subgroup in the same comparison (p \ 0.0001). Using AASIS and MCS score-created subgroups, ES and AL mean domain scores demonstrated hypothesized differences across subgroups (all p values \ 0.0001).
Conclusion:The AAPPO questionnaire is a reliable, valid disease-specific measure of hair loss severity and impact in individuals with AA.
“…Burroway et al noted that no therapy, including diphenylcyclopropenone, systemic immunosuppressants, topicals, or combined treatment was associated with improved long-term prognosis. 95…”
Chemo and targeted anticancer therapies present significant skin adverse reactions, which impair the patients’ quality of life. Cutaneous toxicities lead to poor treatment adherence, drug cessation, and psychosocial distress. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge concerning the prevention and management of skin toxicity arising from these therapies. A systematic literature search on online databases was conducted. The categorization of the main preventive and treatment measures was performed according to the level of evidence. Management of skin adverse reactions of oncology treatments is very heterogeneous, which can be explained by the lack of sound evidence-based treatments. The most studied adverse effects are papulopustular eruption, xerosis, and hand–foot syndrome. Prevention of xerosis stands out as the strategy most supported by level II studies. With respect to treatment, the use of antibiotics in papulopustular eruption resulting from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents is the most evidence-based approach. In general, the number of studies published in the literature classified with a level II of evidence (52%) is similar to the ones classified as level IV (33%), making clear the need of more randomized controlled trials regarding the effectiveness of preventive and treatment measures of skin adverse reactions of chemo and targeted anticancer therapies.
“…Approximately 2% of the world population has alopecia areata (AA), but its prevalence significantly differs by region [1] . Alopecia totalis (AT) is a severe variety of alopecia with more dramatic features and a poor prognosis [2] . Refractory alopecia totalis can be defined as alopecia with unsatisfactory response to systemic treatment or topical immunotherapy.…”
Background: Treatment of resistant alopecia totalis AT is a major problem in general practice. Some studies reported the use of either excimer-308 or intra-muscular triamcinolone acetonide as a monotherapy, with conflicting results. Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of combining 308-excimer phototherapy and intramuscular triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of alopecia totalis. Methods and Material: Ten patients with alopecia totalis were evaluated in this prospective interventional study. All patients were assigned to receive the thera-peutic regimen that includes monthly IM triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) for a maximum of six pulses and twice-weekly excimer phototherapy for 24 sessions. Results: The overall response rate for this regimen was 90%, with four patients 40% achieving complete regrowth of hair (100%). Three patients have exhibited a satisfactory response (>70% regrowth). Unsatisfactory response ( >10-< 70% regrowth) was reported in two patients . Younger patients responded better, as did those with a shorter history of the disease P < 0.05. At follow-up, which continued for 8–12 months, recurrence was noted in two (22.2%) of the nine responders. Conclusions: Combining excimer phototherapy with triamcinolone acetonide showed a promising effect on resistant AT. This treatment modality was effective and well tolerated particularly in young patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.