2021
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2020.3043322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost Sure Resilient Consensus Under Stochastic Interaction:Links Failure and Noisy Channels

Abstract: The resilient consensus problem over a class of discrete-time linear multiagent systems is addressed. Because of external cyber-attacks, some agents are assumed to be malicious and not following a desired cooperative behavior. Thus, the objective consists in designing a control strategy for the healthy agents to reach consensus upon their state vectors, while due to interaction among the agents, the malicious agents try to prevent them to achieve consensus. Although this problem has been investigated by some r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On top of these deterministic system dynamics, some randomness has also been incorporated recently in resilient consensus problems to reflect varied challenges in real-world complex systems. Randomized quantized states [8] and random faulty links [21] have been factored in under the framework of almost sure convergence. In [24], mean square convergence for a class of hybrid systems containing some randomly interacting agents as well as misbehaving ones has been examined.…”
Section: Y Shangmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On top of these deterministic system dynamics, some randomness has also been incorporated recently in resilient consensus problems to reflect varied challenges in real-world complex systems. Randomized quantized states [8] and random faulty links [21] have been factored in under the framework of almost sure convergence. In [24], mean square convergence for a class of hybrid systems containing some randomly interacting agents as well as misbehaving ones has been examined.…”
Section: Y Shangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former considers agreement seeking in a situation where no leader is present, while the objective of the latter is for other agents to follow the trajectory of a leader. Leaderless and tracking consensus problems have been extensively studied in fixed networks [5,20,28], switching or time-varying networks [12,33], and random networks [21,24]. An overview of some classical control theory results on consensus problems can be found in the review paper [20], and more recent advances are reviewed in the works [2,4] from a broader perspective of system science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above notation, it is worth noting that j 1 and j 2 essentially depend on the node i and time t. Clearly, we have j 1 = j 2 if d i (t) is odd. Compared to the W-MSR algorithms [4]- [6], [13], we here involve the weighted median of neighbors' states instead of their (reduced) mean. Recall that the estimate of the number of total malicious agents in the neighborhood of each cooperative agent has to be shared among the network in order to implement a W-MSR type algorithm, which is often not realistic in practice.…”
Section: Median-based Consensus Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We claim that the limit point z must be zero. In fact, if z > 0, we consider three sets of cooperative nodes partitioning C [13]:…”
Section: Resilient Consensus Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation