2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00013-014-0682-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost summing and multiple almost summing multilinear operators on l p spaces

Abstract: We use the Maurey-Rosenthal factorization theorem to give a characterization of almost summing and multiple almost summing multilinear operators on a cartesian product of lp spaces. As applications we give the necessary and sufficient conditions for the multiplication operator on lp spaces be almost summing and multiple almost summing.Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46G25; Secondary 46B25, 46C99.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ideal of almost summing linear operators was introduced in [14] and several classes of almost summing multilinear operators have been studied, see, e.g. [4,6,19,21,25]. Such classes often fail to be hyper-ideals: Example 2.9.…”
Section: The Inequality Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideal of almost summing linear operators was introduced in [14] and several classes of almost summing multilinear operators have been studied, see, e.g. [4,6,19,21,25]. Such classes often fail to be hyper-ideals: Example 2.9.…”
Section: The Inequality Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of multiple m-linear almost summing was initially introduced in [11] and explored in other papers of which we highlight [18,19]. Let…”
Section: Multiple Almost Summing Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As usual, it is the inequality that is used in the computations, so it has been taken for grant that almost summing operators are defined by inequality (4). Following this understanding, the classes of almost summing linear and multilinear operators and their relatives have been extensively studied (see, e.g., [8,9,12,27,29] and a very recent contribution in [33]) using inequality (4) or its multilinear version as definition. As to the transformation of vector-valued sequences, since ℓ u 2 (·) < ℓ w 2 (·) and Rad(·) ≺ RAD(·), by Corollary 1.6(iii) the following are equivalent for an n-linear operator…”
Section: Proof (A) =⇒ (B) From (A) and Proposition 14[(a) =⇒ (C)]mentioning
confidence: 99%