2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12095-020-00423-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost p-ary sequences

Abstract: In this paper we study almost p-ary sequences and their autocorrelation coefficients. We first study the number ℓ of distinct out-of-phase autocorrelation coefficients for an almost p-ary sequence of period n + s with s consecutive zero-symbols. We prove an upper bound and a lower bound on ℓ. It is shown that ℓ can not be less than min{s, p, n}. In particular, it is shown that a nearly perfect sequence with at least two consecutive zero symbols does not exist. Next we define a new difference set, partial direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we present a method to construct the difference sets - Proposition 1). Similar to [34], we show that an almost m-ary NPS of type (γ 1 , γ 2 ) with non-consecutive two zerosymbols is equivalent to an -PDPDS (see Proposition 2) and their non-existence for γ 2 ≤ 3 (see Proposition 4). Next, we study the notion of multipliers and the orbit combination for -PDPDS, and we prove a necessary condition on their multiplier set (see Proposition 5).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Then we present a method to construct the difference sets - Proposition 1). Similar to [34], we show that an almost m-ary NPS of type (γ 1 , γ 2 ) with non-consecutive two zerosymbols is equivalent to an -PDPDS (see Proposition 2) and their non-existence for γ 2 ≤ 3 (see Proposition 4). Next, we study the notion of multipliers and the orbit combination for -PDPDS, and we prove a necessary condition on their multiplier set (see Proposition 5).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Then, some non-existence results for NPS with two consecutive zero-symbols were proven by using their PDPDS equivalence. Here, we extend this one-to-one equivalence to the non-consecutive case and show that an NPS with two zero-symbols is related to an -PDPDS, see the consecutive zero result in [34,Theorem 3]. As its proof is very similar to the consecutive case, we do not give its proof here.…”
Section: -Partial Direct Product Difference Setsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations