2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2010.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost everywhere well-posedness of continuity equations with measure initial data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7] we were able to achieve the existence of limit points even when Coulomb singularities and crossings are present, namely assuming only that U b satisfies (5), (6), and (a) when Coulomb singularities but no crossings are present, namely assuming that U b ∈ C 1 . If one wishes to improve (a) and (b), trying to prove a full convergence result as ε ↓ 0 under weaker regularity assumptions on b (say ∇U ∈ W 1,p or ∇U ∈ BV out of Coulomb singularities), one faces the difficulty that the continuity equation (7) is well posed only in good functional spaces like L ∞ + [0, T ]; L 1 ∩ L ∞ (R d ) (see [13], [1], [12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7] we were able to achieve the existence of limit points even when Coulomb singularities and crossings are present, namely assuming only that U b satisfies (5), (6), and (a) when Coulomb singularities but no crossings are present, namely assuming that U b ∈ C 1 . If one wishes to improve (a) and (b), trying to prove a full convergence result as ε ↓ 0 under weaker regularity assumptions on b (say ∇U ∈ W 1,p or ∇U ∈ BV out of Coulomb singularities), one faces the difficulty that the continuity equation (7) is well posed only in good functional spaces like L ∞ + [0, T ]; L 1 ∩ L ∞ (R d ) (see [13], [1], [12]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependance of the mass imbalance on Planck's constant is not easily visible from Figure 11. To clarify the situation we run several numerical experiments for a variety of values of and θ : θ = (2,3,4,6,8,9,12,14,17,18,21,23)/24, = 5 · 10 −1 , 10 −1 , 5 · 10 −2 , 10 −2 , 5 · 10 −3 .…”
Section: Collision Of Two Wave Packetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been highlighted in [17], the regularity of the potential is not as important as the overall behavior of the underlying classical flow, φ t : (x, k) → (X(t), K(t)), where It is well known that the flow φ t defined by (2) is well-defined for all (x, k) ∈ R 2d as long as V ∈ C 1,1 (R d ), and that the problem (2) has weak solutions (possibly many) for all (x, k) ∈ R 2d as long as V ∈ C 1 (R d ). This basic observation puts nicely in context why any V / ∈ C 1,1 (R d ) is called non-smooth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,13,14], and more recently in strong topology in [6,7]). More precisely, it is well-known that the limit dynamics of the Schrödinger equation is related to the Liouville equation 4) and, roughly speaking, the above results state that: (A) If U is of class C 2 and there exists a sequence ε k → 0 such that W ε k ρ 0,ε k converges in the sense of distribution to some (nonnegative) measure µ 0 , then W ε k ρ ε k t → (Φ t ) # µ 0 (the convergence is again in the sense of distribution), where Φ t is the (unique) flow map associated to the Hamiltonian system ẋ = p, p = −∇U (x) (1.5) so that µ t := (Φ t ) # µ 0 is the unique solution to (1.4) (here and in the sequel, # denotes the push-forward, so that µ t (A) = µ 0 (Φ −1 t (A)) for all A ⊂ R 2n Borel). (B) If U is of class C 1 and there exists a sequence ε k → 0 such that the curve t → W ε k ρ ε k t converges in the sense of distribution to some curve of (nonnegative) measure t → µ t , then µ t solves (1.4).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%