2016
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8205/829/2/l23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alma-Sz Detection of a Galaxy Cluster Merger Shock at Half the Age of the Universe

Abstract: We present ALMA measurements of a merger shock using the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect signal, at the location of a radio relic in the famous El Gordo galaxy cluster at z ≈ 0.9. Multi-wavelength analysis in combination with the archival Chandra data and a high-resolution radio image provides a consistent picture of the thermal and non-thermal signal variation across the shock front and helps to put robust constraints on the shock Mach number as well as the relic magnetic field. We employ a Bayesian an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, analogous approaches have already been shown over the past two decadeds to provide a reliable technique for studying interferometric observations of the SZ effect (see e.g. Carlstrom et al 1996;LaRoque et al 2006;Feroz et al 2009;Mroczkowski et al 2009;Basu et al 2016;Abdulla et al 2019, for an incomplete list of examples of applications of the interferometric modelling technique). We therefore follow this method as well in our joint SZ analysis, rather than relying on image-space techniques, while incorporating some of the recent advances in Bayesian and uv-space modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, analogous approaches have already been shown over the past two decadeds to provide a reliable technique for studying interferometric observations of the SZ effect (see e.g. Carlstrom et al 1996;LaRoque et al 2006;Feroz et al 2009;Mroczkowski et al 2009;Basu et al 2016;Abdulla et al 2019, for an incomplete list of examples of applications of the interferometric modelling technique). We therefore follow this method as well in our joint SZ analysis, rather than relying on image-space techniques, while incorporating some of the recent advances in Bayesian and uv-space modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, radio interferometers remain the only instruments so far capable of measuring the SZ effect with an angular resolution better than 5 arcsec. The first pioneering observations of the SZ effect with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) demonstrated its ability to provide images of galaxy clusters with such unprecedented angular resolution (Kitayama et al 2016) and to detect discontinuities in the pressure distribution of the ICM (Basu et al 2016). Unfortunately, analysis techniques used for single-dish SZ effect imaging cannot be easily generalized for the fitting of images obtained from interferometric data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the bottom panel the ALMA SZ data indicates a modulated flux (red dot-dashed line) which is the result of interferometric imaging of a step function-like shock signal (shown with the green solid line for the best-fit model). Figures adapted from Basu et al (2016). tected, while the rest of the ICM contribution is filtered by the instrumental response. There is a same problem with interferometric observations, such as those performed with ALMA, as discussed below.…”
Section: Shock Frontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from its morphology, the main parameter defining the shock is the ratio of downstream to upstream pressure at the jump itself. In practice, for a fixed line-of-sight geometry, the available ALMA+ACA data are mainly sensitive to the absolute difference of the downstream and upstream electron pressures near the nose of the shock, i.e., ∆P e = P e,ds − P e,us ; the SZ signal associated with the large-scale distribution of the gas is effectively filtered out (see, e.g., Basu et al 2016, and discussion in Section 3.2). Thus, the modelling of the ALMA signal remains only weakly sensitive to the assumed large-scale model.…”
Section: Sionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, due to the lack of information on the pressure normalization, the marginalized posterior distribution of the Mach number inferred when performing an SZ-only analysis are found to entirely span the corresponding prior interval. To get a meaningful measure of the pressure jump from the ALMA+ACA data, we therefore employ an X-ray-informed analysis of the ALMA+ACA SZ observations as in Section 3.3 of Basu et al (2016), and set the upstream electron pressure P e,us to the value derived by modelling the Chandra data in a narrow sector centered on the shock nose (Markevitch 2006).…”
Section: Sionmentioning
confidence: 99%