2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALMA survey of Lupus class III stars: Early planetesimal belt formation and rapid disc dispersal

Abstract: Class III stars are those in star forming regions without large non-photospheric infrared emission, suggesting recent dispersal of their protoplanetary disks. We observed 30 class III stars in the 1-3 Myr Lupus region with ALMA at ∼856μm, resulting in 4 detections that we attribute to circumstellar dust. Inferred dust masses are 0.036 − 0.093M⊕, ∼1 order of magnitude lower than any previous measurements; one disk is resolved with radius ∼80 au. Two class II sources in the field of view were also detected, and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on their observational results, they suggest that there is rapid protoplanetary disk mm-dust dispersal and evolution such that planetesimals form within ∼2 Myr. Their conclusions suggest that some Lupus disks aged 1-3 Myr are already debris disks and will evolve into objects similar to the currently observed debris disk sample (see Figure 10 in Lovell et al (2021)). Therefore, we aim to further expand on our understanding of the role of Class III disks in the evolutionary process bridging the gap between the protoplanetary and debris disk phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on their observational results, they suggest that there is rapid protoplanetary disk mm-dust dispersal and evolution such that planetesimals form within ∼2 Myr. Their conclusions suggest that some Lupus disks aged 1-3 Myr are already debris disks and will evolve into objects similar to the currently observed debris disk sample (see Figure 10 in Lovell et al (2021)). Therefore, we aim to further expand on our understanding of the role of Class III disks in the evolutionary process bridging the gap between the protoplanetary and debris disk phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…It is important to note here that previous works comparing dust masses of protoplanetary disks with debris disks reported a significant decrease in dust mass of 2-3 orders of magnitude between these two populations (Wyatt 2008;Panić et al 2013;Hardy et al 2015), which they interpret as rapid photoevaporative clearing (Clarke et al 2001). However, these studies mostly included pre-ALMA measurements of protoplanetary disks, which did not have the sensitivity of the more recent ALMA surveys (Ansdell et al 2016;Barenfeld et al 2016;Williams et al 2019;Lovell et al 2021). The current data reveal that even in the protoplanetary disk phase the mass in millimeter grains has already declined to levels comparable to those measured in debris disks.…”
Section: Disk Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This would result in very long dispersal times, much longer than the typically observed value of few Myr (Hernández et al 2008). The fact that Class III objects show mm emission similar to that of field debris disks (Lovell et al 2021;Michel et al 2021), suggests that disks may need to dissipate very fast, much faster than the ages of the ones we observe in the surviving Class II populations. The most likely candidates for these fast dissipation processes are photoevaporation or planet formation.…”
Section: Disk Dispersal Processesmentioning
confidence: 67%