2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALMA constraints on the faint millimetre source number counts and their contribution to the cosmic infrared background

Abstract: We have analysed 18 ALMA continuum maps in Bands 6 and 7, with rms down to 7.8 µJy, to derive differential number counts down to 60 µJy and 100 µJy at λ = 1.3 mm and λ = 1.1 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the non-detection of faint sources in the deepest ALMA field enabled us to set tight upper limits on the number counts down to 30 µJy. This is a factor of four deeper than the currently most stringent upper limit. The area covered by the combined fields is 9.5 × 10 −4 deg 2 at 1.1 mm and 6.6 × 10 −4 deg 2 at … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
128
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
21
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Band 6 we re-observed the [Cii] emission in BDF − 3299 aiming at achieving the same sensitivity of previous observations obtained in Cycle 1 Carniani et al 2015), but with higher (×8) spatial resolution. ALMA Band-6 observations were carried out on 2015 June 30 and July 1 with a extended configuration (longest baseline = 1,570 m) and a precipitable water vapour of PWV = 0.8 mm.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Band 6 we re-observed the [Cii] emission in BDF − 3299 aiming at achieving the same sensitivity of previous observations obtained in Cycle 1 Carniani et al 2015), but with higher (×8) spatial resolution. ALMA Band-6 observations were carried out on 2015 June 30 and July 1 with a extended configuration (longest baseline = 1,570 m) and a precipitable water vapour of PWV = 0.8 mm.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The total flux density for this source is 0.150±0.014mJy, determined by fitting a pointsource model to the visibilities using the uvmodelfit task in CASA. Recent deep ALMA surveys have built up statistics on the number of faint background sources expected in a given field of view (Hatsukade et al 2013;Carniani et al 2015). Given these (sub)millimeter source counts, the number of sources with flux density of >0.15 mJy expected within our field of view is 2.6 1. the ALMA beam radius is ∼0 78 along R.A., it is likely that the ALMA source is the same background object as observed in optical data.…”
Section: Continuum Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Su et al (2015) suspected that the integrated submillimeter flux of the system is likely contaminated by background galaxies due to the excess emission detected at Herschel/SPIRE bands and APEX 870 µm compared to the disk SED model. Using the parameters of the Schechter function in Carniani et al (2015), the probability of a galaxy with an 1.3 mm flux of >0.81 mJy within 4 of the star is ∼0.5%, but increases to 5% and 14% chance within the FWHM and 10% of the primary beam, respectively. For the fainter source, the probability of having a source with an 1.3 mm flux of >0.1 mJy within 4 of the star is 11.4%.…”
Section: Alignment Of a Background Galaxymentioning
confidence: 99%