2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015861610226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The usual way to assess segregation distortion for marker data is by χ 2 tests (Haitham et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2002;Ruiz and Asins, 2003). In the current study, Ninety three (82.3%) primers showed 1:1 disomic segregation pattern and twenty marker alleles (17.69%) showed deviations from Mendelian segregation pattern.…”
Section: Construction Of Genetic Linkage Map and Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The usual way to assess segregation distortion for marker data is by χ 2 tests (Haitham et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2002;Ruiz and Asins, 2003). In the current study, Ninety three (82.3%) primers showed 1:1 disomic segregation pattern and twenty marker alleles (17.69%) showed deviations from Mendelian segregation pattern.…”
Section: Construction Of Genetic Linkage Map and Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Nonetheless as noticed earlier, in the present study, some of the number of positives generated from the BC 1 F 1 cross from CSIR/CRI-ATS06 deviated from the typical Mendelian pattern of segregation, probably due to selfed seeds, which might have resulted in fewer number of positive plants in that backcross. According to Sayed et al (2002) even though markers will generally segregate in a Mendelian manner, distorted segregation ratios may be encountered. Identification of positives for alc gene in BC 1 F 1 generation through phenotypic screening is very difficult and is time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect a true segregation distortion locus in closely related wheat varieties then would require population sizes large enough to detect much smaller selection strengths, as indicated in Fig 6, as well as replicate populations to confirm the effect on segregation is due to selection. An exception to this statement may be in the production of doubled haploid mapping populations, where differences in amenability to doubled haploidy between closely related varieties has the potential to produce segregation distortion that is stronger than in an SSD population structure [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%