The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018392531226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Disparities may also result from differences in 326 measurement technique and in the range of root shapes represented in each study. Interestingly, our 327 results are also similar to findings in Japanese radish (Iwata et al, 1998), which identified principal 328 components for aspect ratio (73.9 PVE), bluntness at the distal end of the root (14.2 PVE), and 329 swelling in the middle of the root (3.9 PVE). 330…”
Section: Principal Components Analysis Of Shoot Biomass and Root Shapsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Disparities may also result from differences in 326 measurement technique and in the range of root shapes represented in each study. Interestingly, our 327 results are also similar to findings in Japanese radish (Iwata et al, 1998), which identified principal 328 components for aspect ratio (73.9 PVE), bluntness at the distal end of the root (14.2 PVE), and 329 swelling in the middle of the root (3.9 PVE). 330…”
Section: Principal Components Analysis Of Shoot Biomass and Root Shapsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…To not only quantify the asymmetries we observe, but to determine which factors modulate them, we conducted an Elliptical Fourier Descriptor (EFD) analysis of leaf outlines (Iwata et al, 1998; Iwata and Ukai, 2002). A powerful feature of EFD is the ability to separate asymmetric sources of shape variance from symmetric, which is important for the question of hand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analysis was performed on the EFDs resulting from the first 20 harmonics of Fourier coefficients. For the analysis of symmetrical shape, a and d coefficients were analyzed, while for analysis of asymmetrical shape, b and c coefficients were analyzed (Iwata et al, 1998). Coefficients of EFDs were calculated at −2 and +2 standard deviations for each principal component and the respective contour shapes reconstructed from an inverse Fourier transformation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC analysis was performed on the EFDs resulting from the first 20 harmonics of Fourier coefficients. Only asymmetric sources of shape variance were analysed using the b and c coefficients [28]. Coefficients of EFD were calculated at 22 and ĂŸ2 s.d.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%