2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ALLUVSIM: A program for event-based stochastic modeling of fluvial depositional systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geologic shape parametrization based on flexible geometric representations have been proposed in [29] and are recently applied to fluvial environments using event-based modeling that mimic the depositional process [30]. See also [31] for a review on object-and process-based modeling methods.…”
Section: Parametrization Methods: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologic shape parametrization based on flexible geometric representations have been proposed in [29] and are recently applied to fluvial environments using event-based modeling that mimic the depositional process [30]. See also [31] for a review on object-and process-based modeling methods.…”
Section: Parametrization Methods: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches are in their infancy, but use outputs from process-based forward stratigraphic models and process-mimicking forward geostatistical models that are conditioned to well and/or seismic data (e.g. Karssenberg et al 2001;Cojan et al 2004;Pyrcz et al 2009). …”
Section: How Well Do the Models Capture The Outcrop Data?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider that an alternative approach based on process-based forward stratigraphic models and process-mimicking forward geostatistical models (e.g. Karssenberg et al 2001;Cojan et al 2004;Pyrcz et al 2009) is more promising because such models can be formulated to explicitly include avulsion processes or their effects. The challenges in applying these forward models include validating their outputs against data-rich modern and ancient reservoir-analogues, and conditioning the models to subsurface well and/or seismic data.…”
Section: Implications For Reservoir Characterization and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limit is that these methods give a deterministic solution which does not cover the reservoir architecture uncertainties. To overcome this limit, Lopez (2003) and Pyrcz et al (2009) introduced stochasticity in their models. Finally, due to the focus on the reproduction of geological processes, data conditioning is difficult, except for well data which can be managed thanks to attraction or repulsion fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%