2005
DOI: 10.1515/9783110920567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allusion and Meaning in John 6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a tacit reference to another literary work and activates the independent elements from the evoked text (cf. Hylen, 2005). In the example above, the function of allusion falls in the meta-textual domain.…”
Section: Pun and Metaphormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a tacit reference to another literary work and activates the independent elements from the evoked text (cf. Hylen, 2005). In the example above, the function of allusion falls in the meta-textual domain.…”
Section: Pun and Metaphormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gary T. Manning (2004: 7), in an effort to avoid ‘misusing parallels’, centers on verbal (lexical and phraseological) similarities of related motifs and imageries. In contrast, Susan Hylen (2005: 41-43) employs a broader notion that includes ‘parallels in narrative shape’. The difference between these scholars appears in addressing multiple allusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertextuality is the key feature of the modern cognitive system characterized by the perception of text as a definite self-developing phenomenon with a plurality of meanings being its immanent component. This fact makes intertextual interaction a constant subject of interest for linguists (Bogatyrev, 2016;Lunkova, 2011;Malahovskaya, 2007;Bazerman, 2004;Duff, 2004;Hylen, 2005;etc. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%