2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02245.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allozyme and microsatellite DNA markers of toothfish population structure in the Southern Ocean

Abstract: Toothfish represent a major finfish resource in the Southern Ocean, where there has been a rapid increase in exploitation of the Patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides. Molecular genetic methods have been applied to address questions relating to stock discrimination in D. eleginoides. Eight microsatellite loci were tested in population samples from the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Ocean sectors of the Southern Ocean. Some loci were characterised by a large number of alleles, but no alleles were restric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear which model is the most appropriate for microsatellite data, and several authors regard the solution to lie between the extremes of IAM and SMM (Bagley et al 1999;Nei and Kumar 2000). Several recent applications of microsatellites to spatial differentiation in fisheries species have reported similar results with F ST and R ST (Ruzzante et al 1996;Smith and McVeagh 2000). Given the concordance between mtDNA and microsatellite results reported here for mangrove jack, it is unlikely that the implementation of R ST would uncover hidden population subdivision.…”
Section: Population Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is unclear which model is the most appropriate for microsatellite data, and several authors regard the solution to lie between the extremes of IAM and SMM (Bagley et al 1999;Nei and Kumar 2000). Several recent applications of microsatellites to spatial differentiation in fisheries species have reported similar results with F ST and R ST (Ruzzante et al 1996;Smith and McVeagh 2000). Given the concordance between mtDNA and microsatellite results reported here for mangrove jack, it is unlikely that the implementation of R ST would uncover hidden population subdivision.…”
Section: Population Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These two loci have also shown the lowest (cmrDe13) and highest (cmrDe9) allele numbers in other studies performed with the five markers used here (Reilly & Ward, 1999;Smith & McVeagh, 2000;Appleyard et al, 2002Appleyard et al, , 2004Shaw et al, 2004;Rogers et al, 2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…We tested five microsatellite markers (cmrDe2, cmrDe4, cmrDe9, cmrDe13, and cmrDe30) (Reilly & Ward, 1999) in an offshore Chilean population. These markers had been commonly used in genetic diversity studies to evaluate the distribution and population structure of the Patagonian toothfish in the Southern Ocean, Antarctic Islands, Patagonian shelf (Falkland/Malvinas Islands), and Atlantic, West and Western Indian Ocean sectors (Smith & McVeagh, 2000;Appleyard et al, 2002Appleyard et al, , 2004Shaw et al, 2004;Rogers et al, 2006). Our main objectives were to evaluate genetic diversity and estimate paternity/ maternity exclusion probabilities, in order to evaluate the potential utility of these five markers in broodstock management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic data indicate considerable population heterogeneity (e.g. Smith & McVeagh 2000, Appleyard et al 2002 and a substantial barrier to gene flow between the North Scotia Ridge and South Georgia (Shaw et al 2004, Rogers et al 2006. These results corroborated length-at-age data that imply that the ACC structures populations by mitigating cross-frontal movement and promoting advection of vulnerable life stages downstream (Ashford 2001, Ashford et al 2003.…”
Section: Do Otolith Chemistry and Population Structure Vary At Matchimentioning
confidence: 77%