2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1302395110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allosteric mechanisms can be distinguished using structural mass spectrometry

Abstract: The activity of many proteins, including metabolic enzymes, molecular machines, and ion channels, is often regulated by conformational changes that are induced or stabilized by ligand binding. In cases of multimeric proteins, such allosteric regulation has often been described by the concerted Monod-Wyman-Changeux and sequential Koshland-Némethy-Filmer classic models of cooperativity. Despite the important functional implications of the mechanism of cooperativity, it has been impossible in many cases to distin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
151
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
151
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reports include membrane protein complexes (solubilized in detergent micelles) (62)(63)(64), which are particularly challenging for many techniques in structural biology, as well as 18-MDa virus capsids (51), which are thought to be the biggest molecules accessible to the technique with the current state of instrumentation. The resolving power of the technique is often sufficient to monitor posttranslational modifications (such as glycosylation and phosphorylation) and small ligand binding on intact protein complexes up to the megadalton range (18,58,61). Data acquisition takes on the order of minutes between samples, allowing kinetic measurements of relatively slow reactions in the minutes-to-hours timescale (65).…”
Section: Native Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent reports include membrane protein complexes (solubilized in detergent micelles) (62)(63)(64), which are particularly challenging for many techniques in structural biology, as well as 18-MDa virus capsids (51), which are thought to be the biggest molecules accessible to the technique with the current state of instrumentation. The resolving power of the technique is often sufficient to monitor posttranslational modifications (such as glycosylation and phosphorylation) and small ligand binding on intact protein complexes up to the megadalton range (18,58,61). Data acquisition takes on the order of minutes between samples, allowing kinetic measurements of relatively slow reactions in the minutes-to-hours timescale (65).…”
Section: Native Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ammonium bicarbonate has a higher buffer capacity but may cause protein unfolding at the gas-water interface introduced by bubble formation of the CO 2 gas (17). EDDA was recently introduced and shown to be particularly suitable for the analysis of the ATP-binding GroEL chaperone, resulting in very good desolvation and high-mass resolving power (18).…”
Section: Analytical Challenges In the Mass Analysis Of Protein Assembmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) and their biological function. These conformational changes can take place in a concerted fashion according to the MonodWyman-Changeux (MWC) model (2), as proposed and recently demonstrated in the case of the chaperonin GroEL (3,4). Alternatively, the changes can occur in a domino-like sequential fashion according to the Koshland-Némethy-Filmer model (5) or in a probabilistic manner, as suggested in the case of the proteolytic machine ClpP (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No requirement for crystals, low sample need (pmol) and short measurement time (min) allowing high-throughput processing are considered to be the main strengths of MS. As it has been shown recently, nanoflow ESI-MS studies can distinguish coexisting protein populations with different number of bound ligands (nucleotides for ATPases) and determine the rank order of binding affinities and the role of transient asymmetries of higher-order ring systems in the function of chaperonins and transcription activators (Dyachenko et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: F Mass Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%