2009
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1745409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allosteric control of Escherichia coli rRNA promoter complexes by DksA

Abstract: The Escherichia coli DksA protein inserts into the RNA polymerase (RNAP) secondary channel, modifying the transcription initiation complex so that promoters with specific kinetic characteristics are regulated by changes in the concentrations of ppGpp and NTPs. We used footprinting assays to determine the specific kinetic intermediate, RP I , on which DksA acts. Genetic approaches identified substitutions in the RNAP switch regions, bridge helix, and trigger loop that mimicked, reduced, or enhanced DksA functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
233
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(117 reference statements)
25
233
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). The results support recent findings that DksA is essential for the ppGppdependent inhibition of the rRNA promoters (Rutherford et al, 2009). Moreover, the lack of DksA not only abrogates the inhibitory effect of high ppGpp levels but in addition must somehow affect the basal activity of the rrn promoters during exponential growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2b). The results support recent findings that DksA is essential for the ppGppdependent inhibition of the rRNA promoters (Rutherford et al, 2009). Moreover, the lack of DksA not only abrogates the inhibitory effect of high ppGpp levels but in addition must somehow affect the basal activity of the rrn promoters during exponential growth.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This regulation involves the small effector nucleotide ppGpp and the RNA polymerase secondary channel-binding protein DksA (Potrykus & Cashel, 2008;Rutherford et al, 2009;Wagner, 2010). Encouraged by our earlier observation that individual E. coli rRNAs are not transcribed at the same rate and apparently respond differentially to transcriptional regulators, such as FIS, H-NS and LRP (Hillebrand et al, 2005;Liebig & Wagner, 1995;Pul et al, 2005), we asked if the induction of the stringent control might also affect the individual rRNA promoters to a different extent, resulting in non-equal distribution of rRNAs derived from different operons under variable growth conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mRNA sequence signals needed for translational repression are not present in our constructs, and thus translational feedback could not be responsible for the observed in vivo-in vitro discrepancy, perhaps additional factors affected by the ΔdksA mutation contribute to regulation of some r-protein promoters in vivo. (11,36). The promoter sequences that contribute to the susceptibility of rRNA promoter complexes to inhibition by ppGpp/DksA are complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient limitation triggers alterations in the activity and promoter preferences of RNA polymerase, and major changes in the cell's gene expression program prime the cell for maintenance and survival rather than growth. 58 Several starvation-regulated factors can directly influence transcription by RNA polymerase, including the alarmone ppGpp (binding at the β′-ω and the β′-DksA interfaces of RNA polymerase), 59,60 the small RNA 6S (binding the σ 70 -RNA polymerase holoenzyme) 61,62 and a number of protein factors (DksA, 63 alternative sigma factors, 64 and anti-sigma factors 65 ) (reviewed in ref. 66).…”
Section: Why Degrade Trna?mentioning
confidence: 99%