1985
DOI: 10.1084/jem.162.1.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allospecific cytolytic T lymphocytes recognize conformational determinants on hybrid mouse transplantation antigens.

Abstract: Alloreactive cytolytic T cell (CTL) lines and clones have been used to identify the sites of polymorphism of antigens of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Specific CTL were generated against wild-type H-2b products by cells from H-2b mutant mice that had one or a few amino acid changes in either the alpha 1 or alpha 2 domains of the Kb or Db class I molecules. These CTL populations, which might be expected to react with determinants expressed on single MHC domains, were examined for lytic activity on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three antigens share both public and private class I antigenic determinants, and most of the antigenic differences that have been observed among these molecules appear to correlate with discrete sequence substitutions. Previously, studies involving the serological characterization of exon-shuffled class I gene products have succeeded in localizing the structures recognized by several different allospecific mAb to individual protein domains (21,(34)(35)(36)(37) . Unfortunately, attempts to correlate such serological determinants with specific sets of amino acids have been complicated by the comparison of class I products that differ at multiple amino acid residues (38) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The three antigens share both public and private class I antigenic determinants, and most of the antigenic differences that have been observed among these molecules appear to correlate with discrete sequence substitutions. Previously, studies involving the serological characterization of exon-shuffled class I gene products have succeeded in localizing the structures recognized by several different allospecific mAb to individual protein domains (21,(34)(35)(36)(37) . Unfortunately, attempts to correlate such serological determinants with specific sets of amino acids have been complicated by the comparison of class I products that differ at multiple amino acid residues (38) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conformational interactions between class I domains have been implicated in previous studies involving the H-2K b series of class I mutants (40,41) where one to three amino acid changes in either the al or a2 domains usually result in the loss of most of the CTL epitopes . Further evidence for conformational interactions and the requirement for domain compatibility comes from studies involving the shuffling of exons that encode the al and a2 domains of class I molecules (34)(35)(36). In these studies it was found that virtually all of the CTL epitopes characteristic of the native molecules are absent from the hybrid molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two membrane-distal domains, N and C1, are the most important for the immunological function of the class I antigens . The sites within class I molecules responsible for recognition by both monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and CTLs have been partially localized and shown to predominantly reside in these two domains (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) . Much of the localization of mAb and CTL epitopes has used hybrid class I molecules produced by the expression in mouse L cells of recombinant genes in which the exons encoding the individual external domains have been exchanged (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the effects of treatment on the T-and B-cell compartments could have a variety of explanations. It could be due to a difference in the receptor idiotypes expressed (since different receptor gene pools are used), to a difference in activation requirements, or to the selective recognition of different epitopes on the same MHC antigens by B cells and T cells, a suggestion supported by analysis of T-cell lines and clones specific for a panel of in vitro derived H-2K'' mutants (Bluestone et al 1985). In light of these results, it is indeed difficult to explain the basis of earlier findings indicating significant idiotype sharing between T and B cells, with dramatic implications for transplantation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%