2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2012.02680.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alloreactivity: An Old Puzzle Revisited

Abstract: Alloreactivity, defined as a strong primary T cell response against allelic variants of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules in the species, has been a long‐standing puzzle in immunology with some of its details remaining unclear up to now. Here I shall provide a historical overview of how our understanding of alloreactivity has evolved and propose an interpretation that considers alloreactivity to be a mixture of four mechanistically distinct prototypes of T cell response, namely, self‐restricted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the generation of an effective antibody response to a kidney allograft, T‐lymphocyte help to B cells, enhanced by the CD40‐CD40 ligand pathway, is required . However, before this happens, T lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ cells) are primed either by recognition of mismatched HLA antigen epitopes on donor antigen‐presenting cells (APC) (direct allorecognition) or by peptides derived from processed foreign HLA molecules expressed on antigen‐presenting dendritic cells of the recipient (indirect allorecognition) . It is generally acknowledged that, if suppression of the T cell‐dependent immune response by immunosuppressive agents is not sufficient, both (direct and indirect) pathways are active during the whole lifespan of the graft, contributing to chronic organ transplant injury .…”
Section: Recognition Of Foreign Tissue By the Recipient's Immune Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the generation of an effective antibody response to a kidney allograft, T‐lymphocyte help to B cells, enhanced by the CD40‐CD40 ligand pathway, is required . However, before this happens, T lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ cells) are primed either by recognition of mismatched HLA antigen epitopes on donor antigen‐presenting cells (APC) (direct allorecognition) or by peptides derived from processed foreign HLA molecules expressed on antigen‐presenting dendritic cells of the recipient (indirect allorecognition) . It is generally acknowledged that, if suppression of the T cell‐dependent immune response by immunosuppressive agents is not sufficient, both (direct and indirect) pathways are active during the whole lifespan of the graft, contributing to chronic organ transplant injury .…”
Section: Recognition Of Foreign Tissue By the Recipient's Immune Systmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9] aGvHD is caused by alloreactivity, defined as the donorimmunocompetent cell response against foreign recognized molecules, usually peptides, of the minor and major histocompatibility complex in the host. [10][11][12] The pathophysiology of aGvHD implies multiple tissue and organ damage, mainly affecting the liver, the gastrointestinal tract and/or the skin. 13 The first stage involves the effect of the conditioning regimen and the underlying disease on the host, with the activation of the recipient's APC as well as the release of cytokines and chemokines from the injured tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed alloreactivity among both CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell subsets, indicating that antigen-display functions of MHCI and MHCII are normal in CD B cells (27). This suggests that CD B cells acquire antigens derived from dying cells and/or through autophagy in an MHCII-dependent pathway (27, 74); conversely, the antigens for MHCI-dependent presentation can be acquired from the intracellular space for canonical presentation and/or from the extracellular space for cross-presentation (27, 75). Unlike allogeneic co-cultures, little or no T-cell proliferation was observed in the autologous T-B co-cultures (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%