1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65442-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alloplastic Replacement of the Urinary Bladder

Abstract: The positive outcome of these animal experiments suggests this system would be useful for human bladder substitution. Standardized industrial production of the prostheses will be needed prior to implantation in humans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These biomaterials have also been associated with in vivo fibrosis and contracture [32]. Synthetic biomaterials in the form of 3D porous foams, meshes, and hydrogels derived from poly-glycolic acid (PGA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLA), copolymers of poly-lactic and -glycolic acid (PLGA) [3337]; PTFE Teflon [38]; polyether urethane [39]; silicone rubber [40]; and poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) [41] have also been utilized as platforms for bladder reconstructive strategies. However, permanent synthetic biomaterials routinely demonstrate in vivo mechanical failure and urinary stone formation and thus are limited in clinical applications [42].…”
Section: Conventional Biomaterials For Bladder and Urethral Defect Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biomaterials have also been associated with in vivo fibrosis and contracture [32]. Synthetic biomaterials in the form of 3D porous foams, meshes, and hydrogels derived from poly-glycolic acid (PGA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLA), copolymers of poly-lactic and -glycolic acid (PLGA) [3337]; PTFE Teflon [38]; polyether urethane [39]; silicone rubber [40]; and poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) [41] have also been utilized as platforms for bladder reconstructive strategies. However, permanent synthetic biomaterials routinely demonstrate in vivo mechanical failure and urinary stone formation and thus are limited in clinical applications [42].…”
Section: Conventional Biomaterials For Bladder and Urethral Defect Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many synthetic materials have been tried in experimental and clinical settings as bladder replacements (such as polyvinyl sponges, tetrafluoroethylene, gelatin scaffolds, collagen matrices, and vicryl matrices). 4,8,25,42,59,70,85 However, these attempts have usually failed because of mechanical, structural, functional, or biocompatibility problems. Also, permanent synthetic materials often succumb to mechanical failure, and urinary stone formation and the use of degradable materials lead to fibroblast deposition, scarring, graft contracture, and a reduced reservoir volume over time.…”
Section: Nanostructured Bladder Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using cell‐free collagen matrices, scarring and graft contracture may occur over time (69–74). Synthetic materials, which have been tried previously in experimental and clinical settings, include polyvinyl sponge, tetrafluoroethylene (Teflon), collagen matrices, vicryl matrices, and silicone (75–78). Most of the above attempts have usually failed due to mechanical, structural, functional, or biocompatibility problems.…”
Section: Tissue Engineering Of Urologic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%