1984
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1984.55.5.273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alloplastic Implants of Tricalcium Phosphate Ceramic in Human Periodontal Osseous Defects

Abstract: Initial pilot studies using tricalcium phosphate ceramic placed into human periodontal osseous defects demonstrated osseous repair. Therefore, further evaluation of this material was undertaken on 17 carefully selected patients with 1-wall, 2-wall, crestal and furcation defects using standardized preoperative and postoperative radiographs, clinical measurements and clinical photographs. Inverse bevel, full-thickness flaps were raised, the areas debrided, root surfaces planed with ultrasonic and hand instrument… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the CPC‐R group did not exhibit additional benefits in terms of PD reduction and CAL gain compared to the OFD group in accordance with other studies 8,9,14,15,26 evaluating alloplast materials. However, a number of studies 4‐7,10‐13,18 demonstrated a greater reduction in PD and a greater gain in CAL with grafting materials compared to OFD. This discrepancy in clinical outcomes, especially in the grafted group, might be explained by the different methods 27 used for comparisons between subjects and material selections, measurements, surgical techniques, 26–28 and defect characteristics 29,30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the CPC‐R group did not exhibit additional benefits in terms of PD reduction and CAL gain compared to the OFD group in accordance with other studies 8,9,14,15,26 evaluating alloplast materials. However, a number of studies 4‐7,10‐13,18 demonstrated a greater reduction in PD and a greater gain in CAL with grafting materials compared to OFD. This discrepancy in clinical outcomes, especially in the grafted group, might be explained by the different methods 27 used for comparisons between subjects and material selections, measurements, surgical techniques, 26–28 and defect characteristics 29,30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of grafting materials have been used in bone grafting for the treatment of periodontal defects to obtain periodontal tissue regeneration 1–3 . Among grafting modalities, xenogenic or alloplastic osteoconductive materials, such as bovine bone‐derived mineral, 4,5 coralline calcium carbonate, 6,7 calcium‐layered composite of poly‐methyl‐methacrylate and poly‐hydroxyl‐ethyl‐methacrylate, 8,9 hydroxyapatite, 10–12 bioactive glass, 13–15 and tricalcium phosphate, 16–18 are options. This is because of their handling characteristics, their ready availability in various sizes, and the lack of morbidity that can result from harvesting autogenous bone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beta‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP) (Ca 3 [PO 4 ] 2 ) belongs to the group of bioactive bioceramics of completely synthetic origin and has been used in periodontology as a bone graft substitute since the 1970s 23‐25 . Although acceptable clinical results were reported after treatment of intrabony periodontal defects involving surgical implantation of β‐TCP, 23‐29 contradictory information was provided in various publications from animal experimental studies 30,31 and human histologic cases, 24,32‐35 with the former mostly reporting about large amounts of periodontal regeneration after β‐TCP implantation in intrabony defects and the latter showing minimal bone formation, no periodontal regeneration, and rapid resorption or encapsulation of the β‐TCP particles by connective tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of periodontics has witnessed some of the most significant growth related to the development of therapies for periodontal regeneration in the last 15 to 20 years. Treatments including use of growth factors or extracellular matrix proteins, “grafting” with bone or bone substitutes, 1‐17 cell occlusive barrier membranes for selective cell growth in periodontal defects, 18‐24 and modification of the tooth root surface 25‐30 have all been explored for their ability to predictably regenerate the periodontium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%