2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-012-0124-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allometry of the postnatal cranial ontogeny and sexual dimorphism in Otaria byronia (Otariidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the youngest female of our sample exhibit lesser CS than the youngest males analyzed. These results suggest that sexual dimorphism in skull shape is size-related, as has been reported in other mammals (e.g., Cardini and Elton, 2008;Flores and Casinos, 2011;Tarnawski et al, 2014aTarnawski et al, , 2014b, although, as a general trend, favoring males.…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphismsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the youngest female of our sample exhibit lesser CS than the youngest males analyzed. These results suggest that sexual dimorphism in skull shape is size-related, as has been reported in other mammals (e.g., Cardini and Elton, 2008;Flores and Casinos, 2011;Tarnawski et al, 2014aTarnawski et al, , 2014b, although, as a general trend, favoring males.…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphismsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…4) derives in an amount of the available space for the accommodation of the temporalis. This character seems to be common in mammals (and perhaps a plesiomorphic condition), as was detected in the ontogeny of several groups of marine and terrestrial mammals (e.g., Segura and Prevosti, 2012;Flores et al, 2013;Segura et al, 2013;Tarnawski et al, 2014aTarnawski et al, , 2014b. Although the longer rostrum suggests a decreasing of the mechanical advantages at the tip (Preuschoft and Witzel, 2002;Segura and Prevosti, 2012;Segura et al, 2013), its length, associated with a well-developed temporal musculature, also implies a gain in mouth-closing speed at the tip, making prey catch function in adults more efficient.…”
Section: Ontogenetic Changesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…12) to describe skull components in all specimens of the ontogenetic series. The craniomandibular dimensions analyzed here, partially overlap with those considered in other morphometric studies of mammalian skulls (Abdala et al 2001;Giannini et al 2004Giannini et al , 2010Cassini et al 2012Cassini et al , 2015Flores et al 2013;Tarnawski et al 2014aTarnawski et al ,b, 2015. To estimate growth trends, we used multivariate analyses based on the generalized allometry equation originally proposed by Jolicoeur (1963).…”
Section: Quantitative (Allometric) Analysissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…; Tarnawski et al. ,b, ). To estimate growth trends, we used multivariate analyses based on the generalized allometry equation originally proposed by Jolicoeur ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Growth in cranial size is often found to be the primary way to increase bite force across ontogeny (La Croix et al ., 2011b; Santana and Miller, 2016; Law et al ., 2016b; Ginot et al ., 2020). However, many carnivorans also exhibit significant cranial shape changes across ontogeny such as the development of the sagittal and nuchal crests (Tanner et al ., 2010; La Croix et al ., 2011a; Tarnawski et al ., 2013; Tarnawski et al ., 2015). Although these developmental changes are often viewed to increase jaw muscle size by increasing muscle attachment sites on the skull (Radinsky, 1981a; Radinsky, 1981b), how they actually relate to ontogenetic increases in bite force are rarely quantified in mammals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%