2017
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allografts versus Equine Xenografts in Calcaneal Fracture Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another aspect to be considered in the choice of bone graft is the cost. As shown in several studies, another argument for xenogeneic bone grafts is that they are less expensive than allogeneic grafts [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect to be considered in the choice of bone graft is the cost. As shown in several studies, another argument for xenogeneic bone grafts is that they are less expensive than allogeneic grafts [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autograft merupakan graft yang diambil dari bagian tubuh pasien itu sendiri, allograft marupakan graft yang diambil dari manusia lain (same species), sedangkan xenograft merupakan graft yang diambil dari spesies mamalia. Berbagai jenis bone graft tersebut memiliki kelemahan, diantaranya risiko terjadinya infeksi, berpotensi merusak kesehatan jaringan tulang, biaya yang mahal, membutuhkan prosedur medis yang rumit (Puska, Aho, & Vallittu, 2011) serta berpotensi menyebabkan komplikasi dari donor (Sonmez, Armagan, Ugurlar, & Eren, 2017). Sehingga diperlukan alternatif untuk menangani kelemahan tersebut, salah satunya adalah penggunaan bone graft yang terbuat dari material buatan (sintetis) (Van Lieshout, Van Kralingen, El-Massoudi, Weinans, & Patka, 2011).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Successful ARP outcomes were recently achieved by grafting the post-extraction socket with enzyme-deantigenic equine bone (EDEB), which also consists of a mixture of cancellous and cortical bone granules (diameter 0.25-1 mm) made non-antigenic with digestive enzymes [37,38]. In addition to ARP procedures, EDEB was used with satisfactory results in peri-apical cyst-removal management [39], horizontal/vertical ridge and sinus augmentation [40][41][42], and orthopedic applications [43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%