1989
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(89)90058-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Allograft vs. exposure in the treatment of scalds—a prospective randomized controlled clinical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of different temporary cover materials is available: the most common ones are allografts (cadaver skin from a skin bank, amnion membrane) (95–105), xenografts [primarily porcine skin (106,107), less commonly used nowadays] or (semi) synthetic materials. One of the semisynthetic materials is bilayered and designed in such a way that the wound bed grows into the wound side layer of the material: it thus becomes a ‘neodermis’(108–111).…”
Section: Principles Of Wound Management In Burn Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of different temporary cover materials is available: the most common ones are allografts (cadaver skin from a skin bank, amnion membrane) (95–105), xenografts [primarily porcine skin (106,107), less commonly used nowadays] or (semi) synthetic materials. One of the semisynthetic materials is bilayered and designed in such a way that the wound bed grows into the wound side layer of the material: it thus becomes a ‘neodermis’(108–111).…”
Section: Principles Of Wound Management In Burn Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different temporary cover materials is available: the most common ones are allografts (cadaver skin from a skin bank, amnion membrane) (95)(96)(97)(98)(99)(100)(101)(102)(103)(104)(105), xenografts [primarily porcine skin (106,107), less commonly . when the depth of a burn is difficult to determine, tangenitial excision can be used as a diagnostic tool .…”
Section: Full Thickness Burnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of reports of permanent success in the early years of homografting, it was soon concluded that permanent take was impossible with homografts. In 1926 it was proposed that the immunological system of the recipient was responsible for the fate of the homograft tissue [13] and that suppression of the recipient's immune system was one of the routes available for achieving a permanent take [14].…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%